Mexico vs Norway: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, annual growth rate
Mexico
1.19 % change on previous year
in 2024
Norway
1.19 % change on previous year
in 2024
Mexico rank
120th
Norway rank
122nd
Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, annual growth rate over time
- Mexico
- Norway
How they compare
Mexico currently reports 1.19 % change on previous year against 1.19 % change on previous year in Norway, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 168 shared years of data; in 1857 it was Mexico ahead.
Mexico ranks 120th and Norway ranks 122nd of 194 countries.
Across the 18 decades both report, Mexico averaged higher in 16 and Norway in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mexico | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1850s | 60.88 % change on previous year | 12.73 % change on previous year | 48.15 % change on previous year | Mexico |
| 1860s | 13.83 % change on previous year | 6.98 % change on previous year | 6.85 % change on previous year | Mexico |
| 1870s | 5.92 % change on previous year | 4.09 % change on previous year | 1.83 % change on previous year | Mexico |
| 1880s | 8.96 % change on previous year | 2.98 % change on previous year | 5.98 % change on previous year | Mexico |
| 1890s | 7.07 % change on previous year | 2.53 % change on previous year | 4.53 % change on previous year | Mexico |
| 1900s | 3.84 % change on previous year | 2.1 % change on previous year | 1.74 % change on previous year | Mexico |
| 1910s | 1.79 % change on previous year | 1.91 % change on previous year | 0.1199 % change on previous year | Norway |
| 1920s | 2.58 % change on previous year | 1.5 % change on previous year | 1.07 % change on previous year | Mexico |
| 1930s | 1.67 % change on previous year | 1.34 % change on previous year | 0.334 % change on previous year | Mexico |
| 1940s | 2.82 % change on previous year | 0.8208 % change on previous year | 2 % change on previous year | Mexico |
| 1950s | 2.39 % change on previous year | 0.5805 % change on previous year | 1.81 % change on previous year | Mexico |
| 1960s | 1.35 % change on previous year | 0.4038 % change on previous year | 0.945 % change on previous year | Mexico |
| 1970s | 1.56 % change on previous year | 1.35 % change on previous year | 0.2075 % change on previous year | Mexico |
| 1980s | 2.7 % change on previous year | 1.55 % change on previous year | 1.15 % change on previous year | Mexico |
| 1990s | 2.43 % change on previous year | 1.73 % change on previous year | 0.6979 % change on previous year | Mexico |
| 2000s | 2.04 % change on previous year | 1.64 % change on previous year | 0.4 % change on previous year | Mexico |
| 2010s | 1.6 % change on previous year | 1.5 % change on previous year | 0.1032 % change on previous year | Mexico |
| 2020s | 1.23 % change on previous year | 1.28 % change on previous year | 0.0473 % change on previous year | Norway |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, annual growth rate, Mexico or Norway?
- Mexico, at 1.19 % change on previous year against 1.19 % change on previous year in Norway as of 2024.
- What is the difference in cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, annual growth rate between Mexico and Norway?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Mexico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Norway?
- 168 years are reported by both, from 1857 to 2024.
- How do Mexico and Norway rank globally for cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, annual growth rate?
- Mexico ranks 120th and Norway ranks 122nd of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.