Moldova vs Nicaragua: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, annual growth rate
Moldova
0.1346 % change on previous year
in 2024
Nicaragua
0.3328 % change on previous year
in 2024
Moldova rank
190th
Nicaragua rank
188th
Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, annual growth rate over time
- Moldova
- Nicaragua
How they compare
Nicaragua currently reports 0.3328 % change on previous year against 0.1346 % change on previous year in Moldova, a difference of 0.1982 % change on previous year.
That makes Nicaragua's figure about 2.5 times Moldova's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 154 shared years of data; in 1871 it was Nicaragua ahead.
Moldova ranks 190th and Nicaragua ranks 188th of 194 countries.
Across the 16 decades both report, Moldova averaged higher in 4 and Nicaragua in 12.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Moldova | Nicaragua | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1870s | 4.87 % change on previous year | 45.94 % change on previous year | 41.08 % change on previous year | Nicaragua |
| 1880s | 3.42 % change on previous year | 8.37 % change on previous year | 4.95 % change on previous year | Nicaragua |
| 1890s | 2.85 % change on previous year | 5.42 % change on previous year | 2.57 % change on previous year | Nicaragua |
| 1900s | 2.65 % change on previous year | 3.67 % change on previous year | 1.02 % change on previous year | Nicaragua |
| 1910s | 1.82 % change on previous year | 2.95 % change on previous year | 1.12 % change on previous year | Nicaragua |
| 1920s | 1.24 % change on previous year | 4.68 % change on previous year | 3.44 % change on previous year | Nicaragua |
| 1930s | 1.99 % change on previous year | 3.45 % change on previous year | 1.46 % change on previous year | Nicaragua |
| 1940s | 2.17 % change on previous year | 3.64 % change on previous year | 1.47 % change on previous year | Nicaragua |
| 1950s | 3.6 % change on previous year | 3.47 % change on previous year | 0.128 % change on previous year | Moldova |
| 1960s | 3 % change on previous year | 1.23 % change on previous year | 1.76 % change on previous year | Moldova |
| 1970s | 3.72 % change on previous year | 0.6889 % change on previous year | 3.03 % change on previous year | Moldova |
| 1980s | 3.4 % change on previous year | 1.05 % change on previous year | 2.35 % change on previous year | Moldova |
| 1990s | 1.06 % change on previous year | 2 % change on previous year | 0.9412 % change on previous year | Nicaragua |
| 2000s | 0.1581 % change on previous year | 1.32 % change on previous year | 1.16 % change on previous year | Nicaragua |
| 2010s | 0.0886 % change on previous year | 0.39 % change on previous year | 0.3014 % change on previous year | Nicaragua |
| 2020s | 0.151 % change on previous year | 0.3122 % change on previous year | 0.1611 % change on previous year | Nicaragua |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, annual growth rate, Moldova or Nicaragua?
- Nicaragua, at 0.3328 % change on previous year against 0.1346 % change on previous year in Moldova as of 2024.
- What is the difference in cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, annual growth rate between Moldova and Nicaragua?
- 0.1982 % change on previous year, with Nicaragua ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Moldova and Nicaragua?
- 154 years are reported by both, from 1871 to 2024.
- How do Moldova and Nicaragua rank globally for cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, annual growth rate?
- Moldova ranks 190th and Nicaragua ranks 188th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.