Pakistan vs Tunisia: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, annual growth rate

Pakistan
2.14 % change on previous year
in 2024
Tunisia
2.23 % change on previous year
in 2024
Pakistan rank
67th
Tunisia rank
65th

Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, annual growth rate over time

  • Pakistan
  • Tunisia
0255075100191719702024

How they compare

Tunisia currently reports 2.23 % change on previous year against 2.14 % change on previous year in Pakistan, a difference of 0.09 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 78 shared years of data; in 1947 it was Pakistan ahead.

Pakistan ranks 67th and Tunisia ranks 65th of 194 countries.

Across the 9 decades both report, Pakistan averaged higher in 7 and Tunisia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Pakistan Tunisia Difference Ahead
1940s 64.53 % change on previous year 6.32 % change on previous year 58.21 % change on previous year Pakistan
1950s 14.41 % change on previous year 5.87 % change on previous year 8.54 % change on previous year Pakistan
1960s 4.77 % change on previous year 3.16 % change on previous year 1.61 % change on previous year Pakistan
1970s 2.01 % change on previous year 3.5 % change on previous year 1.5 % change on previous year Tunisia
1980s 2.33 % change on previous year 2.79 % change on previous year 0.4539 % change on previous year Tunisia
1990s 3.03 % change on previous year 2.94 % change on previous year 0.0877 % change on previous year Pakistan
2000s 3.06 % change on previous year 2.93 % change on previous year 0.1277 % change on previous year Pakistan
2010s 3.19 % change on previous year 2.8 % change on previous year 0.3842 % change on previous year Pakistan
2020s 2.73 % change on previous year 2.29 % change on previous year 0.4307 % change on previous year Pakistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, annual growth rate, Pakistan or Tunisia?
Tunisia, at 2.23 % change on previous year against 2.14 % change on previous year in Pakistan as of 2024.
What is the difference in cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, annual growth rate between Pakistan and Tunisia?
0.09 % change on previous year, with Tunisia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Pakistan and Tunisia?
78 years are reported by both, from 1947 to 2024.
How do Pakistan and Tunisia rank globally for cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, annual growth rate?
Pakistan ranks 67th and Tunisia ranks 65th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Pakistan vs Tunisia: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-including-land-use-change-annual-growth-rate/pakistan/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-including-land-use-change-annual-growth-rate/pakistan/tunisia/">Pakistan vs Tunisia: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
194 places, 20,652 data points, 1851–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.