Somalia vs Turkmenistan: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, annual growth rate

Somalia
2.78 % change on previous year
in 2024
Turkmenistan
2.84 % change on previous year
in 2024
Somalia rank
44th
Turkmenistan rank
43rd

Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, annual growth rate over time

  • Somalia
  • Turkmenistan
0255075100185919412024

How they compare

Turkmenistan currently reports 2.84 % change on previous year against 2.78 % change on previous year in Somalia, a difference of 0.06 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 13 times across 74 shared years of data; in 1951 it was Somalia ahead.

Somalia ranks 44th and Turkmenistan ranks 43rd of 194 countries.

Across the 8 decades both report, Somalia averaged higher in 3 and Turkmenistan in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Somalia Turkmenistan Difference Ahead
1950s 34.22 % change on previous year 6.54 % change on previous year 27.68 % change on previous year Somalia
1960s 6.9 % change on previous year 5.13 % change on previous year 1.77 % change on previous year Somalia
1970s 4.29 % change on previous year 4.82 % change on previous year 0.529 % change on previous year Turkmenistan
1980s 3.77 % change on previous year 4.13 % change on previous year 0.3608 % change on previous year Turkmenistan
1990s 3.01 % change on previous year 3.28 % change on previous year 0.2624 % change on previous year Turkmenistan
2000s 3.48 % change on previous year 3.19 % change on previous year 0.2922 % change on previous year Somalia
2010s 2.65 % change on previous year 2.98 % change on previous year 0.3204 % change on previous year Turkmenistan
2020s 2.63 % change on previous year 3.24 % change on previous year 0.6149 % change on previous year Turkmenistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, annual growth rate, Somalia or Turkmenistan?
Turkmenistan, at 2.84 % change on previous year against 2.78 % change on previous year in Somalia as of 2024.
What is the difference in cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, annual growth rate between Somalia and Turkmenistan?
0.06 % change on previous year, with Turkmenistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Somalia and Turkmenistan?
74 years are reported by both, from 1951 to 2024.
How do Somalia and Turkmenistan rank globally for cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, annual growth rate?
Somalia ranks 44th and Turkmenistan ranks 43rd of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Somalia vs Turkmenistan: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-including-land-use-change-annual-growth-rate/somalia-fed-rep/turkmenistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-including-land-use-change-annual-growth-rate/somalia-fed-rep/turkmenistan/">Somalia vs Turkmenistan: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
194 places, 20,652 data points, 1851–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.