Austria vs Ecuador: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled

Austria
5.97 billion tonnes
in 2024
Ecuador
5.81 billion tonnes
in 2024
Austria rank
52nd
Ecuador rank
55th

Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled over time

  • Austria
  • Ecuador
02.0B4.0B6.0B185019372024

How they compare

Austria currently reports 5.97 billion tonnes against 5.81 billion tonnes in Ecuador, a difference of 155.00 million tonnes.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 133 shared years of data; in 1892 it was Austria ahead.

Austria ranks 52nd and Ecuador ranks 55th of 194 countries.

Across the 14 decades both report, Austria averaged higher in 11 and Ecuador in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Austria Ecuador Difference Ahead
1890s 650.31 million tonnes 38.39 million tonnes 611.91 million tonnes Austria
1900s 956.94 million tonnes 152.22 million tonnes 804.72 million tonnes Austria
1910s 1.43 billion tonnes 298.35 million tonnes 1.13 billion tonnes Austria
1920s 1.63 billion tonnes 427.10 million tonnes 1.20 billion tonnes Austria
1930s 1.81 billion tonnes 734.38 million tonnes 1.07 billion tonnes Austria
1940s 1.91 billion tonnes 1.27 billion tonnes 643.07 million tonnes Austria
1950s 2.11 billion tonnes 1.81 billion tonnes 299.37 million tonnes Austria
1960s 2.42 billion tonnes 2.39 billion tonnes 27.53 million tonnes Austria
1970s 2.88 billion tonnes 2.83 billion tonnes 45.48 million tonnes Austria
1980s 3.41 billion tonnes 3.63 billion tonnes 225.11 million tonnes Ecuador
1990s 3.98 billion tonnes 4.30 billion tonnes 318.65 million tonnes Ecuador
2000s 4.66 billion tonnes 4.77 billion tonnes 106.83 million tonnes Ecuador
2010s 5.37 billion tonnes 5.32 billion tonnes 53.42 million tonnes Austria
2020s 5.85 billion tonnes 5.74 billion tonnes 114.90 million tonnes Austria

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled, Austria or Ecuador?
Austria, at 5.97 billion tonnes against 5.81 billion tonnes in Ecuador as of 2024.
What is the difference in cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled between Austria and Ecuador?
155.00 million tonnes, with Austria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Ecuador?
133 years are reported by both, from 1892 to 2024.
How do Austria and Ecuador rank globally for cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled?
Austria ranks 52nd and Ecuador ranks 55th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Austria vs Ecuador: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-including-land-use-change-gaps-filled/austria/ecuador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-including-land-use-change-gaps-filled/austria/ecuador/">Austria vs Ecuador: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled
Unit
tonnes
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
194 places, 21,015 data points, 1850–2024
Last refreshed

Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change with 79 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.