Azerbaijan vs Serbia: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled

Azerbaijan
3.23 billion tonnes
in 2024
Serbia
3.37 billion tonnes
in 2024
Azerbaijan rank
78th
Serbia rank
77th

Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled over time

  • Azerbaijan
  • Serbia
01.0B2.0B3.0B185019372024

How they compare

Serbia currently reports 3.37 billion tonnes against 3.23 billion tonnes in Azerbaijan, a difference of 147.29 million tonnes.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 131 shared years of data; in 1885 it was Azerbaijan ahead.

Azerbaijan ranks 78th and Serbia ranks 77th of 194 countries.

Across the 15 decades both report, Azerbaijan averaged higher in 2 and Serbia in 13.

Head to head by decade

Decade Azerbaijan Serbia Difference Ahead
1880s 124.75 million tonnes 16.26 million tonnes 108.50 million tonnes Azerbaijan
1890s 169.63 million tonnes 104.97 million tonnes 64.66 million tonnes Azerbaijan
1900s 221.30 million tonnes 266.67 million tonnes 45.38 million tonnes Serbia
1910s 267.41 million tonnes 388.44 million tonnes 121.03 million tonnes Serbia
1920s 322.05 million tonnes 518.83 million tonnes 196.77 million tonnes Serbia
1930s 381.07 million tonnes 700.84 million tonnes 319.77 million tonnes Serbia
1940s 460.28 million tonnes 841.46 million tonnes 381.19 million tonnes Serbia
1950s 597.29 million tonnes 1.08 billion tonnes 479.31 million tonnes Serbia
1960s 849.08 million tonnes 1.37 billion tonnes 522.13 million tonnes Serbia
1970s 1.19 billion tonnes 1.70 billion tonnes 511.19 million tonnes Serbia
1980s 1.65 billion tonnes 2.16 billion tonnes 515.02 million tonnes Serbia
1990s 2.13 billion tonnes 2.61 billion tonnes 477.47 million tonnes Serbia
2000s 2.48 billion tonnes 2.93 billion tonnes 445.84 million tonnes Serbia
2010s 2.83 billion tonnes 3.15 billion tonnes 314.33 million tonnes Serbia
2020s 3.14 billion tonnes 3.32 billion tonnes 182.87 million tonnes Serbia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled, Azerbaijan or Serbia?
Serbia, at 3.37 billion tonnes against 3.23 billion tonnes in Azerbaijan as of 2024.
What is the difference in cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled between Azerbaijan and Serbia?
147.29 million tonnes, with Serbia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Serbia?
131 years are reported by both, from 1885 to 2024.
How do Azerbaijan and Serbia rank globally for cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled?
Azerbaijan ranks 78th and Serbia ranks 77th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Azerbaijan vs Serbia: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-including-land-use-change-gaps-filled/azerbaijan/serbia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-including-land-use-change-gaps-filled/azerbaijan/serbia/">Azerbaijan vs Serbia: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled
Unit
tonnes
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
194 places, 21,015 data points, 1850–2024
Last refreshed

Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change with 79 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.