Azerbaijan vs Zimbabwe: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled

Azerbaijan
3.23 billion tonnes
in 2024
Zimbabwe
2.93 billion tonnes
in 2024
Azerbaijan rank
78th
Zimbabwe rank
81st

Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled over time

  • Azerbaijan
  • Zimbabwe
01.0B2.0B3.0B185019372024

How they compare

Azerbaijan currently reports 3.23 billion tonnes against 2.93 billion tonnes in Zimbabwe, a difference of 293.24 million tonnes.

That makes Azerbaijan's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 122 shared years of data; in 1903 it was Azerbaijan ahead.

Azerbaijan ranks 78th and Zimbabwe ranks 81st of 194 countries.

Azerbaijan has averaged higher in every one of the 13 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Azerbaijan Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1900s 229.36 million tonnes 13.05 million tonnes 216.30 million tonnes Azerbaijan
1910s 275.72 million tonnes 49.10 million tonnes 226.62 million tonnes Azerbaijan
1920s 322.05 million tonnes 116.71 million tonnes 205.34 million tonnes Azerbaijan
1930s 381.07 million tonnes 216.53 million tonnes 164.55 million tonnes Azerbaijan
1940s 460.28 million tonnes 366.16 million tonnes 94.12 million tonnes Azerbaijan
1950s 597.29 million tonnes 572.24 million tonnes 25.05 million tonnes Azerbaijan
1960s 849.08 million tonnes 803.53 million tonnes 45.55 million tonnes Azerbaijan
1970s 1.19 billion tonnes 1.07 billion tonnes 116.18 million tonnes Azerbaijan
1980s 1.65 billion tonnes 1.41 billion tonnes 238.56 million tonnes Azerbaijan
1990s 2.13 billion tonnes 1.91 billion tonnes 228.09 million tonnes Azerbaijan
2000s 2.48 billion tonnes 2.48 billion tonnes 235,000 tonnes Azerbaijan
2010s 2.83 billion tonnes 2.81 billion tonnes 19.64 million tonnes Azerbaijan
2020s 3.14 billion tonnes 2.91 billion tonnes 230.20 million tonnes Azerbaijan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled, Azerbaijan or Zimbabwe?
Azerbaijan, at 3.23 billion tonnes against 2.93 billion tonnes in Zimbabwe as of 2024.
What is the difference in cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled between Azerbaijan and Zimbabwe?
293.24 million tonnes, with Azerbaijan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Zimbabwe?
122 years are reported by both, from 1903 to 2024.
How do Azerbaijan and Zimbabwe rank globally for cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled?
Azerbaijan ranks 78th and Zimbabwe ranks 81st of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Azerbaijan vs Zimbabwe: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-including-land-use-change-gaps-filled/azerbaijan/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-including-land-use-change-gaps-filled/azerbaijan/zimbabwe/">Azerbaijan vs Zimbabwe: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled
Unit
tonnes
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
194 places, 21,015 data points, 1850–2024
Last refreshed

Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change with 79 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.