Bahamas vs Eswatini: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled

Bahamas
182.77 million tonnes
in 2024
Eswatini
189.94 million tonnes
in 2024
Bahamas rank
159th
Eswatini rank
158th

Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled over time

  • Bahamas
  • Eswatini
050.0M100.0M150.0M200.0M195019872024

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 189.94 million tonnes against 182.77 million tonnes in Bahamas, a difference of 7.16 million tonnes.

Across all 75 years both countries report, Eswatini has been ahead every year.

Bahamas ranks 159th and Eswatini ranks 158th of 194 countries.

Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 8 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bahamas Eswatini Difference Ahead
1950s 1.73 million tonnes 32.58 million tonnes 30.85 million tonnes Eswatini
1960s 9.72 million tonnes 75.15 million tonnes 65.44 million tonnes Eswatini
1970s 52.37 million tonnes 97.89 million tonnes 45.52 million tonnes Eswatini
1980s 101.84 million tonnes 113.20 million tonnes 11.36 million tonnes Eswatini
1990s 118.97 million tonnes 139.60 million tonnes 20.63 million tonnes Eswatini
2000s 137.83 million tonnes 159.87 million tonnes 22.05 million tonnes Eswatini
2010s 158.70 million tonnes 176.06 million tonnes 17.36 million tonnes Eswatini
2020s 176.86 million tonnes 187.40 million tonnes 10.54 million tonnes Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled, Bahamas or Eswatini?
Eswatini, at 189.94 million tonnes against 182.77 million tonnes in Bahamas as of 2024.
What is the difference in cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled between Bahamas and Eswatini?
7.16 million tonnes, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Eswatini?
75 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2024.
How do Bahamas and Eswatini rank globally for cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled?
Bahamas ranks 159th and Eswatini ranks 158th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bahamas vs Eswatini: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-including-land-use-change-gaps-filled/bahamas-the/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-including-land-use-change-gaps-filled/bahamas-the/eswatini/">Bahamas vs Eswatini: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled
Unit
tonnes
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
194 places, 21,015 data points, 1850–2024
Last refreshed

Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change with 79 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.