Bolivia vs Sweden: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled

Bolivia
7.60 billion tonnes
in 2024
Sweden
7.56 billion tonnes
in 2024
Bolivia rank
44th
Sweden rank
46th

Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled over time

  • Bolivia
  • Sweden
02.0B4.0B6.0B8.0B185019372024

How they compare

Bolivia currently reports 7.60 billion tonnes against 7.56 billion tonnes in Sweden, a difference of 40.03 million tonnes.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 137 shared years of data; in 1862 it was Sweden ahead.

Bolivia ranks 44th and Sweden ranks 46th of 194 countries.

Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 15 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bolivia Sweden Difference Ahead
1860s 16.68 million tonnes 478.54 million tonnes 461.86 million tonnes Sweden
1870s -45.91 million tonnes 782.33 million tonnes 828.24 million tonnes Sweden
1880s -19.98 million tonnes 1.12 billion tonnes 1.14 billion tonnes Sweden
1910s 229.32 million tonnes 2.50 billion tonnes 2.27 billion tonnes Sweden
1920s 605.02 million tonnes 2.81 billion tonnes 2.21 billion tonnes Sweden
1930s 1.12 billion tonnes 3.27 billion tonnes 2.16 billion tonnes Sweden
1940s 1.55 billion tonnes 3.69 billion tonnes 2.14 billion tonnes Sweden
1950s 1.86 billion tonnes 4.13 billion tonnes 2.27 billion tonnes Sweden
1960s 2.22 billion tonnes 4.45 billion tonnes 2.23 billion tonnes Sweden
1970s 2.58 billion tonnes 4.99 billion tonnes 2.41 billion tonnes Sweden
1980s 3.06 billion tonnes 5.55 billion tonnes 2.49 billion tonnes Sweden
1990s 3.81 billion tonnes 6.03 billion tonnes 2.22 billion tonnes Sweden
2000s 5.36 billion tonnes 6.58 billion tonnes 1.22 billion tonnes Sweden
2010s 6.55 billion tonnes 7.11 billion tonnes 556.93 million tonnes Sweden
2020s 7.34 billion tonnes 7.46 billion tonnes 128.84 million tonnes Sweden

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled, Bolivia or Sweden?
Bolivia, at 7.60 billion tonnes against 7.56 billion tonnes in Sweden as of 2024.
What is the difference in cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled between Bolivia and Sweden?
40.03 million tonnes, with Bolivia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia and Sweden?
137 years are reported by both, from 1862 to 2024.
How do Bolivia and Sweden rank globally for cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled?
Bolivia ranks 44th and Sweden ranks 46th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bolivia vs Sweden: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-including-land-use-change-gaps-filled/bolivia/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-including-land-use-change-gaps-filled/bolivia/sweden/">Bolivia vs Sweden: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled
Unit
tonnes
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
194 places, 21,015 data points, 1850–2024
Last refreshed

Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change with 79 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.