Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Malawi: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled

Bosnia and Herzegovina
1.27 billion tonnes
in 2024
Malawi
1.19 billion tonnes
in 2024
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
117th
Malawi rank
120th

Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Malawi
0500.0M1.0B1.5B188519542024

How they compare

Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 1.27 billion tonnes against 1.19 billion tonnes in Malawi, a difference of 85.24 million tonnes.

That makes Bosnia and Herzegovina's figure about 1.1 times Malawi's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 75 shared years of data; in 1950 it was Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 117th and Malawi ranks 120th of 194 countries.

Bosnia and Herzegovina has averaged higher in every one of the 8 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina Malawi Difference Ahead
1950s 625.94 million tonnes 77.89 million tonnes 548.05 million tonnes Bosnia and Herzegovina
1960s 632.05 million tonnes 276.62 million tonnes 355.42 million tonnes Bosnia and Herzegovina
1970s 665.62 million tonnes 493.72 million tonnes 171.90 million tonnes Bosnia and Herzegovina
1980s 776.31 million tonnes 593.65 million tonnes 182.65 million tonnes Bosnia and Herzegovina
1990s 863.34 million tonnes 702.60 million tonnes 160.74 million tonnes Bosnia and Herzegovina
2000s 922.10 million tonnes 900.71 million tonnes 21.39 million tonnes Bosnia and Herzegovina
2010s 1.08 billion tonnes 1.07 billion tonnes 15.64 million tonnes Bosnia and Herzegovina
2020s 1.23 billion tonnes 1.16 billion tonnes 68.99 million tonnes Bosnia and Herzegovina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Malawi?
Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 1.27 billion tonnes against 1.19 billion tonnes in Malawi as of 2024.
What is the difference in cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Malawi?
85.24 million tonnes, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Malawi?
75 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2024.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Malawi rank globally for cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 117th and Malawi ranks 120th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Malawi: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-including-land-use-change-gaps-filled/bosnia-and-herzegovina/malawi/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-including-land-use-change-gaps-filled/bosnia-and-herzegovina/malawi/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Malawi: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled
Unit
tonnes
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
194 places, 21,015 data points, 1850–2024
Last refreshed

Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change with 79 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.