Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Sierra Leone: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled

Bosnia and Herzegovina
1.27 billion tonnes
in 2024
Sierra Leone
1.33 billion tonnes
in 2024
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
117th
Sierra Leone rank
116th

Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Sierra Leone
0500.0M1.0B1.5B188519542024

How they compare

Sierra Leone currently reports 1.33 billion tonnes against 1.27 billion tonnes in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 61.07 million tonnes.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 75 shared years of data; in 1950 it was Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 117th and Sierra Leone ranks 116th of 194 countries.

Across the 8 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 6 and Sierra Leone in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina Sierra Leone Difference Ahead
1950s 625.94 million tonnes 43.88 million tonnes 582.06 million tonnes Bosnia and Herzegovina
1960s 632.05 million tonnes 112.62 million tonnes 519.43 million tonnes Bosnia and Herzegovina
1970s 665.62 million tonnes 199.54 million tonnes 466.08 million tonnes Bosnia and Herzegovina
1980s 776.31 million tonnes 302.56 million tonnes 473.74 million tonnes Bosnia and Herzegovina
1990s 863.34 million tonnes 388.13 million tonnes 475.21 million tonnes Bosnia and Herzegovina
2000s 922.10 million tonnes 808.03 million tonnes 114.08 million tonnes Bosnia and Herzegovina
2010s 1.08 billion tonnes 1.21 billion tonnes 127.65 million tonnes Sierra Leone
2020s 1.23 billion tonnes 1.31 billion tonnes 79.84 million tonnes Sierra Leone

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Sierra Leone?
Sierra Leone, at 1.33 billion tonnes against 1.27 billion tonnes in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2024.
What is the difference in cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Sierra Leone?
61.07 million tonnes, with Sierra Leone ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Sierra Leone?
75 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2024.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Sierra Leone rank globally for cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 117th and Sierra Leone ranks 116th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Sierra Leone: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-including-land-use-change-gaps-filled/bosnia-and-herzegovina/sierra-leone/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-including-land-use-change-gaps-filled/bosnia-and-herzegovina/sierra-leone/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Sierra Leone: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled
Unit
tonnes
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
194 places, 21,015 data points, 1850–2024
Last refreshed

Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change with 79 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.