Democratic Republic of Congo vs Thailand: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled

Democratic Republic of Congo
26.04 billion tonnes
in 2024
Thailand
25.18 billion tonnes
in 2024
Democratic Republic of Congo rank
18th
Thailand rank
19th

Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled over time

  • Democratic Republic of Congo
  • Thailand
010.0B20.0B30.0B192019722024

How they compare

Democratic Republic of Congo currently reports 26.04 billion tonnes against 25.18 billion tonnes in Thailand, a difference of 859.60 million tonnes.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 94 shared years of data; in 1931 it was Democratic Republic of Congo ahead.

Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 18th and Thailand ranks 19th of 194 countries.

Across the 10 decades both report, Democratic Republic of Congo averaged higher in 5 and Thailand in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Democratic Republic of Congo Thailand Difference Ahead
1930s 1.07 billion tonnes 682.68 million tonnes 390.35 million tonnes Democratic Republic of Congo
1940s 2.39 billion tonnes 2.04 billion tonnes 342.72 million tonnes Democratic Republic of Congo
1950s 4.75 billion tonnes 3.99 billion tonnes 757.47 million tonnes Democratic Republic of Congo
1960s 7.89 billion tonnes 6.43 billion tonnes 1.47 billion tonnes Democratic Republic of Congo
1970s 9.15 billion tonnes 9.81 billion tonnes 661.20 million tonnes Thailand
1980s 10.13 billion tonnes 13.19 billion tonnes 3.06 billion tonnes Thailand
1990s 11.23 billion tonnes 15.56 billion tonnes 4.33 billion tonnes Thailand
2000s 13.00 billion tonnes 18.29 billion tonnes 5.29 billion tonnes Thailand
2010s 19.49 billion tonnes 21.64 billion tonnes 2.16 billion tonnes Thailand
2020s 24.65 billion tonnes 24.42 billion tonnes 227.54 million tonnes Democratic Republic of Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled, Democratic Republic of Congo or Thailand?
Democratic Republic of Congo, at 26.04 billion tonnes against 25.18 billion tonnes in Thailand as of 2024.
What is the difference in cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled between Democratic Republic of Congo and Thailand?
859.60 million tonnes, with Democratic Republic of Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of Congo and Thailand?
94 years are reported by both, from 1931 to 2024.
How do Democratic Republic of Congo and Thailand rank globally for cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled?
Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 18th and Thailand ranks 19th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Democratic Republic of Congo vs Thailand: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-including-land-use-change-gaps-filled/congo-dem-rep/thailand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-including-land-use-change-gaps-filled/congo-dem-rep/thailand/">Democratic Republic of Congo vs Thailand: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled
Unit
tonnes
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
194 places, 21,015 data points, 1850–2024
Last refreshed

Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change with 79 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.