Congo vs Croatia: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled

Congo
1.88 billion tonnes
in 2024
Croatia
1.84 billion tonnes
in 2024
Congo rank
101st
Croatia rank
102nd

Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled over time

  • Congo
  • Croatia
0500.0M1.0B1.5B2.0B188519542024

How they compare

Congo currently reports 1.88 billion tonnes against 1.84 billion tonnes in Croatia, a difference of 38.84 million tonnes.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 75 shared years of data; in 1950 it was Croatia ahead.

Congo ranks 101st and Croatia ranks 102nd of 194 countries.

Across the 8 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 1 and Croatia in 7.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Croatia Difference Ahead
1950s 345.87 million tonnes 706.58 million tonnes 360.70 million tonnes Croatia
1960s 831.74 million tonnes 837.14 million tonnes 5.40 million tonnes Croatia
1970s 956.75 million tonnes 973.81 million tonnes 17.06 million tonnes Croatia
1980s 1.04 billion tonnes 1.15 billion tonnes 116.05 million tonnes Croatia
1990s 1.13 billion tonnes 1.39 billion tonnes 257.13 million tonnes Croatia
2000s 1.38 billion tonnes 1.54 billion tonnes 158.93 million tonnes Croatia
2010s 1.64 billion tonnes 1.69 billion tonnes 54.77 million tonnes Croatia
2020s 1.83 billion tonnes 1.81 billion tonnes 17.73 million tonnes Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled, Congo or Croatia?
Congo, at 1.88 billion tonnes against 1.84 billion tonnes in Croatia as of 2024.
What is the difference in cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled between Congo and Croatia?
38.84 million tonnes, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Croatia?
75 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2024.
How do Congo and Croatia rank globally for cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled?
Congo ranks 101st and Croatia ranks 102nd of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Croatia: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-including-land-use-change-gaps-filled/congo-rep/croatia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-including-land-use-change-gaps-filled/congo-rep/croatia/">Congo vs Croatia: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled
Unit
tonnes
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
194 places, 21,015 data points, 1850–2024
Last refreshed

Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change with 79 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.