Congo vs Estonia: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled

Congo
1.88 billion tonnes
in 2024
Estonia
1.80 billion tonnes
in 2024
Congo rank
101st
Estonia rank
104th

Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled over time

  • Congo
  • Estonia
0500.0M1.0B1.5B2.0B185019372024

How they compare

Congo currently reports 1.88 billion tonnes against 1.80 billion tonnes in Estonia, a difference of 81.96 million tonnes.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 75 shared years of data; in 1950 it was Estonia ahead.

Congo ranks 101st and Estonia ranks 104th of 194 countries.

Across the 8 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 3 and Estonia in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Estonia Difference Ahead
1950s 345.87 million tonnes 537.01 million tonnes 191.14 million tonnes Estonia
1960s 831.74 million tonnes 623.83 million tonnes 207.92 million tonnes Congo
1970s 956.75 million tonnes 812.29 million tonnes 144.45 million tonnes Congo
1980s 1.04 billion tonnes 1.12 billion tonnes 85.98 million tonnes Estonia
1990s 1.13 billion tonnes 1.40 billion tonnes 271.52 million tonnes Estonia
2000s 1.38 billion tonnes 1.53 billion tonnes 153.84 million tonnes Estonia
2010s 1.64 billion tonnes 1.68 billion tonnes 45.80 million tonnes Estonia
2020s 1.83 billion tonnes 1.78 billion tonnes 48.03 million tonnes Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled, Congo or Estonia?
Congo, at 1.88 billion tonnes against 1.80 billion tonnes in Estonia as of 2024.
What is the difference in cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled between Congo and Estonia?
81.96 million tonnes, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Estonia?
75 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2024.
How do Congo and Estonia rank globally for cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled?
Congo ranks 101st and Estonia ranks 104th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Estonia: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-including-land-use-change-gaps-filled/congo-rep/estonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-including-land-use-change-gaps-filled/congo-rep/estonia/">Congo vs Estonia: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled
Unit
tonnes
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
194 places, 21,015 data points, 1850–2024
Last refreshed

Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change with 79 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.