Congo vs Singapore: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled

Congo
1.88 billion tonnes
in 2024
Singapore
2.25 billion tonnes
in 2024
Congo rank
101st
Singapore rank
98th

Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled over time

  • Congo
  • Singapore
0500.0M1.0B1.5B2.0B2.5B195019872024

How they compare

Singapore currently reports 2.25 billion tonnes against 1.88 billion tonnes in Congo, a difference of 371.59 million tonnes.

That makes Singapore's figure about 1.2 times Congo's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 75 shared years of data; in 1950 it was Congo ahead.

Congo ranks 101st and Singapore ranks 98th of 194 countries.

Across the 8 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 6 and Singapore in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Singapore Difference Ahead
1950s 345.87 million tonnes 16.61 million tonnes 329.26 million tonnes Congo
1960s 831.74 million tonnes 41.58 million tonnes 790.16 million tonnes Congo
1970s 956.75 million tonnes 176.89 million tonnes 779.86 million tonnes Congo
1980s 1.04 billion tonnes 474.30 million tonnes 561.93 million tonnes Congo
1990s 1.13 billion tonnes 894.85 million tonnes 237.36 million tonnes Congo
2000s 1.38 billion tonnes 1.34 billion tonnes 39.67 million tonnes Congo
2010s 1.64 billion tonnes 1.78 billion tonnes 142.21 million tonnes Singapore
2020s 1.83 billion tonnes 2.15 billion tonnes 319.88 million tonnes Singapore

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled, Congo or Singapore?
Singapore, at 2.25 billion tonnes against 1.88 billion tonnes in Congo as of 2024.
What is the difference in cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled between Congo and Singapore?
371.59 million tonnes, with Singapore ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Singapore?
75 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2024.
How do Congo and Singapore rank globally for cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled?
Congo ranks 101st and Singapore ranks 98th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Singapore: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-including-land-use-change-gaps-filled/congo-rep/singapore/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-including-land-use-change-gaps-filled/congo-rep/singapore/">Congo vs Singapore: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled
Unit
tonnes
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
194 places, 21,015 data points, 1850–2024
Last refreshed

Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change with 79 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.