Congo vs Sri Lanka: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled

Congo
1.88 billion tonnes
in 2024
Sri Lanka
2.25 billion tonnes
in 2024
Congo rank
101st
Sri Lanka rank
99th

Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled over time

  • Congo
  • Sri Lanka
0500.0M1.0B1.5B2.0B195019872024

How they compare

Sri Lanka currently reports 2.25 billion tonnes against 1.88 billion tonnes in Congo, a difference of 364.03 million tonnes.

That makes Sri Lanka's figure about 1.2 times Congo's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 75 shared years of data; in 1950 it was Congo ahead.

Congo ranks 101st and Sri Lanka ranks 99th of 194 countries.

Across the 8 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 3 and Sri Lanka in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
1950s 345.87 million tonnes 134.02 million tonnes 211.85 million tonnes Congo
1960s 831.74 million tonnes 539.55 million tonnes 292.19 million tonnes Congo
1970s 956.75 million tonnes 892.30 million tonnes 64.44 million tonnes Congo
1980s 1.04 billion tonnes 1.08 billion tonnes 46.67 million tonnes Sri Lanka
1990s 1.13 billion tonnes 1.25 billion tonnes 120.83 million tonnes Sri Lanka
2000s 1.38 billion tonnes 1.53 billion tonnes 153.07 million tonnes Sri Lanka
2010s 1.64 billion tonnes 1.94 billion tonnes 301.02 million tonnes Sri Lanka
2020s 1.83 billion tonnes 2.19 billion tonnes 356.15 million tonnes Sri Lanka

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled, Congo or Sri Lanka?
Sri Lanka, at 2.25 billion tonnes against 1.88 billion tonnes in Congo as of 2024.
What is the difference in cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled between Congo and Sri Lanka?
364.03 million tonnes, with Sri Lanka ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Sri Lanka?
75 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2024.
How do Congo and Sri Lanka rank globally for cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled?
Congo ranks 101st and Sri Lanka ranks 99th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Sri Lanka: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-including-land-use-change-gaps-filled/congo-rep/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-including-land-use-change-gaps-filled/congo-rep/sri-lanka/">Congo vs Sri Lanka: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled
Unit
tonnes
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
194 places, 21,015 data points, 1850–2024
Last refreshed

Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change with 79 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.