Croatia vs Latvia: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled

Croatia
1.84 billion tonnes
in 2024
Latvia
1.84 billion tonnes
in 2024
Croatia rank
102nd
Latvia rank
103rd

Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled over time

  • Croatia
  • Latvia
0500.0M1.0B1.5B2.0B185019372024

How they compare

Croatia currently reports 1.84 billion tonnes against 1.84 billion tonnes in Latvia, a difference of 4.12 million tonnes.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 131 shared years of data; in 1885 it was Latvia ahead.

Croatia ranks 102nd and Latvia ranks 103rd of 194 countries.

Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 15 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Croatia Latvia Difference Ahead
1880s 7.42 million tonnes 316.60 million tonnes 309.18 million tonnes Latvia
1890s 53.72 million tonnes 420.34 million tonnes 366.63 million tonnes Latvia
1900s 144.90 million tonnes 534.06 million tonnes 389.17 million tonnes Latvia
1910s 221.28 million tonnes 624.44 million tonnes 403.16 million tonnes Latvia
1920s 318.23 million tonnes 715.80 million tonnes 397.57 million tonnes Latvia
1930s 455.77 million tonnes 785.33 million tonnes 329.56 million tonnes Latvia
1940s 570.63 million tonnes 846.89 million tonnes 276.26 million tonnes Latvia
1950s 706.58 million tonnes 916.60 million tonnes 210.03 million tonnes Latvia
1960s 837.14 million tonnes 1.05 billion tonnes 213.18 million tonnes Latvia
1970s 973.81 million tonnes 1.23 billion tonnes 260.55 million tonnes Latvia
1980s 1.15 billion tonnes 1.48 billion tonnes 325.03 million tonnes Latvia
1990s 1.39 billion tonnes 1.65 billion tonnes 261.71 million tonnes Latvia
2000s 1.54 billion tonnes 1.68 billion tonnes 141.11 million tonnes Latvia
2010s 1.69 billion tonnes 1.75 billion tonnes 59.12 million tonnes Latvia
2020s 1.81 billion tonnes 1.82 billion tonnes 8.28 million tonnes Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled, Croatia or Latvia?
Croatia, at 1.84 billion tonnes against 1.84 billion tonnes in Latvia as of 2024.
What is the difference in cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled between Croatia and Latvia?
4.12 million tonnes, with Croatia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Latvia?
131 years are reported by both, from 1885 to 2024.
How do Croatia and Latvia rank globally for cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled?
Croatia ranks 102nd and Latvia ranks 103rd of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Croatia vs Latvia: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-including-land-use-change-gaps-filled/croatia/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-including-land-use-change-gaps-filled/croatia/latvia/">Croatia vs Latvia: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled
Unit
tonnes
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
194 places, 21,015 data points, 1850–2024
Last refreshed

Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change with 79 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.