Cuba vs Denmark: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled

Cuba
5.80 billion tonnes
in 2024
Denmark
5.57 billion tonnes
in 2024
Cuba rank
56th
Denmark rank
58th

Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled over time

  • Cuba
  • Denmark
02.0B4.0B6.0B185019372024

How they compare

Cuba currently reports 5.80 billion tonnes against 5.57 billion tonnes in Denmark, a difference of 221.85 million tonnes.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 169 shared years of data; in 1856 it was Denmark ahead.

Cuba ranks 56th and Denmark ranks 58th of 194 countries.

Across the 18 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 7 and Denmark in 11.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Denmark Difference Ahead
1850s 8.44 million tonnes 80.47 million tonnes 72.03 million tonnes Denmark
1860s 31.03 million tonnes 155.02 million tonnes 123.99 million tonnes Denmark
1870s 65.32 million tonnes 266.62 million tonnes 201.30 million tonnes Denmark
1880s 102.86 million tonnes 387.71 million tonnes 284.84 million tonnes Denmark
1890s 144.51 million tonnes 526.54 million tonnes 382.03 million tonnes Denmark
1900s 236.11 million tonnes 703.07 million tonnes 466.96 million tonnes Denmark
1910s 438.21 million tonnes 933.41 million tonnes 495.21 million tonnes Denmark
1920s 709.31 million tonnes 1.19 billion tonnes 485.05 million tonnes Denmark
1930s 933.12 million tonnes 1.48 billion tonnes 542.29 million tonnes Denmark
1940s 1.21 billion tonnes 1.75 billion tonnes 541.83 million tonnes Denmark
1950s 1.81 billion tonnes 2.05 billion tonnes 243.60 million tonnes Denmark
1960s 2.51 billion tonnes 2.46 billion tonnes 54.49 million tonnes Cuba
1970s 3.60 billion tonnes 3.03 billion tonnes 568.93 million tonnes Cuba
1980s 4.38 billion tonnes 3.61 billion tonnes 768.68 million tonnes Cuba
1990s 4.99 billion tonnes 4.18 billion tonnes 812.90 million tonnes Cuba
2000s 5.36 billion tonnes 4.76 billion tonnes 605.88 million tonnes Cuba
2010s 5.58 billion tonnes 5.25 billion tonnes 333.84 million tonnes Cuba
2020s 5.75 billion tonnes 5.51 billion tonnes 238.11 million tonnes Cuba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled, Cuba or Denmark?
Cuba, at 5.80 billion tonnes against 5.57 billion tonnes in Denmark as of 2024.
What is the difference in cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled between Cuba and Denmark?
221.85 million tonnes, with Cuba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Denmark?
169 years are reported by both, from 1856 to 2024.
How do Cuba and Denmark rank globally for cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled?
Cuba ranks 56th and Denmark ranks 58th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Denmark: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-including-land-use-change-gaps-filled/cuba/denmark/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-including-land-use-change-gaps-filled/cuba/denmark/">Cuba vs Denmark: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled
Unit
tonnes
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
194 places, 21,015 data points, 1850–2024
Last refreshed

Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change with 79 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.