Denmark vs Ecuador: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled

Denmark
5.57 billion tonnes
in 2024
Ecuador
5.81 billion tonnes
in 2024
Denmark rank
58th
Ecuador rank
55th

Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled over time

  • Denmark
  • Ecuador
02.0B4.0B6.0B185019372024

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 5.81 billion tonnes against 5.57 billion tonnes in Denmark, a difference of 240.60 million tonnes.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 133 shared years of data; in 1892 it was Denmark ahead.

Denmark ranks 58th and Ecuador ranks 55th of 194 countries.

Across the 14 decades both report, Denmark averaged higher in 9 and Ecuador in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Denmark Ecuador Difference Ahead
1890s 541.60 million tonnes 38.39 million tonnes 503.21 million tonnes Denmark
1900s 703.07 million tonnes 152.22 million tonnes 550.85 million tonnes Denmark
1910s 933.41 million tonnes 298.35 million tonnes 635.06 million tonnes Denmark
1920s 1.19 billion tonnes 427.10 million tonnes 767.27 million tonnes Denmark
1930s 1.48 billion tonnes 734.38 million tonnes 741.02 million tonnes Denmark
1940s 1.75 billion tonnes 1.27 billion tonnes 488.92 million tonnes Denmark
1950s 2.05 billion tonnes 1.81 billion tonnes 238.97 million tonnes Denmark
1960s 2.46 billion tonnes 2.39 billion tonnes 70.69 million tonnes Denmark
1970s 3.03 billion tonnes 2.83 billion tonnes 199.67 million tonnes Denmark
1980s 3.61 billion tonnes 3.63 billion tonnes 23.36 million tonnes Ecuador
1990s 4.18 billion tonnes 4.30 billion tonnes 119.22 million tonnes Ecuador
2000s 4.76 billion tonnes 4.77 billion tonnes 14.70 million tonnes Ecuador
2010s 5.25 billion tonnes 5.32 billion tonnes 65.72 million tonnes Ecuador
2020s 5.51 billion tonnes 5.74 billion tonnes 226.25 million tonnes Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled, Denmark or Ecuador?
Ecuador, at 5.81 billion tonnes against 5.57 billion tonnes in Denmark as of 2024.
What is the difference in cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled between Denmark and Ecuador?
240.60 million tonnes, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Ecuador?
133 years are reported by both, from 1892 to 2024.
How do Denmark and Ecuador rank globally for cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled?
Denmark ranks 58th and Ecuador ranks 55th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Denmark vs Ecuador: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-including-land-use-change-gaps-filled/denmark/ecuador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-including-land-use-change-gaps-filled/denmark/ecuador/">Denmark vs Ecuador: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled
Unit
tonnes
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
194 places, 21,015 data points, 1850–2024
Last refreshed

Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change with 79 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.