Ecuador vs Hungary: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled

Ecuador
5.81 billion tonnes
in 2024
Hungary
5.76 billion tonnes
in 2024
Ecuador rank
55th
Hungary rank
57th

Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled over time

  • Ecuador
  • Hungary
02.0B4.0B6.0B185119372024

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 5.81 billion tonnes against 5.76 billion tonnes in Hungary, a difference of 56.19 million tonnes.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 133 shared years of data; in 1892 it was Hungary ahead.

Ecuador ranks 55th and Hungary ranks 57th of 194 countries.

Across the 14 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 2 and Hungary in 12.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Hungary Difference Ahead
1890s 38.39 million tonnes 644.00 million tonnes 605.61 million tonnes Hungary
1900s 152.22 million tonnes 825.78 million tonnes 673.56 million tonnes Hungary
1910s 298.35 million tonnes 1.03 billion tonnes 728.41 million tonnes Hungary
1920s 427.10 million tonnes 1.20 billion tonnes 777.06 million tonnes Hungary
1930s 734.38 million tonnes 1.41 billion tonnes 671.32 million tonnes Hungary
1940s 1.27 billion tonnes 1.61 billion tonnes 342.28 million tonnes Hungary
1950s 1.81 billion tonnes 1.85 billion tonnes 37.71 million tonnes Hungary
1960s 2.39 billion tonnes 2.30 billion tonnes 92.27 million tonnes Ecuador
1970s 2.83 billion tonnes 2.94 billion tonnes 114.39 million tonnes Hungary
1980s 3.63 billion tonnes 3.74 billion tonnes 113.59 million tonnes Hungary
1990s 4.30 billion tonnes 4.43 billion tonnes 132.74 million tonnes Hungary
2000s 4.77 billion tonnes 4.97 billion tonnes 199.46 million tonnes Hungary
2010s 5.32 billion tonnes 5.41 billion tonnes 91.46 million tonnes Hungary
2020s 5.74 billion tonnes 5.69 billion tonnes 44.37 million tonnes Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled, Ecuador or Hungary?
Ecuador, at 5.81 billion tonnes against 5.76 billion tonnes in Hungary as of 2024.
What is the difference in cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled between Ecuador and Hungary?
56.19 million tonnes, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Hungary?
133 years are reported by both, from 1892 to 2024.
How do Ecuador and Hungary rank globally for cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled?
Ecuador ranks 55th and Hungary ranks 57th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Hungary: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-including-land-use-change-gaps-filled/ecuador/hungary/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-including-land-use-change-gaps-filled/ecuador/hungary/">Ecuador vs Hungary: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled
Unit
tonnes
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
194 places, 21,015 data points, 1850–2024
Last refreshed

Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change with 79 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.