Eswatini vs Namibia: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled
Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled over time
- Eswatini
- Namibia
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 219.85 million tonnes against 189.94 million tonnes in Eswatini, a difference of 29.91 million tonnes.
That makes Namibia's figure about 1.2 times Eswatini's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Eswatini ahead.
Eswatini ranks 158th and Namibia ranks 155th of 194 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 3 and Namibia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 140.78 million tonnes | 30.48 million tonnes | 110.30 million tonnes | Eswatini |
| 2000s | 159.87 million tonnes | 80.06 million tonnes | 79.81 million tonnes | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 176.06 million tonnes | 142.03 million tonnes | 34.02 million tonnes | Eswatini |
| 2020s | 187.40 million tonnes | 201.89 million tonnes | 14.49 million tonnes | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled, Eswatini or Namibia?
- Namibia, at 219.85 million tonnes against 189.94 million tonnes in Eswatini as of 2024.
- What is the difference in cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled between Eswatini and Namibia?
- 29.91 million tonnes, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Namibia?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2024.
- How do Eswatini and Namibia rank globally for cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled?
- Eswatini ranks 158th and Namibia ranks 155th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change with 79 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.