Guatemala vs Norway: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled

Guatemala
4.51 billion tonnes
in 2024
Norway
3.83 billion tonnes
in 2024
Guatemala rank
68th
Norway rank
71st

Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled over time

  • Guatemala
  • Norway
01.0B2.0B3.0B4.0B5.0B185019372024

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 4.51 billion tonnes against 3.83 billion tonnes in Norway, a difference of 681.28 million tonnes.

That makes Guatemala's figure about 1.2 times Norway's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 155 shared years of data; in 1870 it was Norway ahead.

Guatemala ranks 68th and Norway ranks 71st of 194 countries.

Across the 16 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 7 and Norway in 9.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Norway Difference Ahead
1870s 28.43 million tonnes 348.03 million tonnes 319.60 million tonnes Norway
1880s 68.74 million tonnes 486.19 million tonnes 417.45 million tonnes Norway
1890s 93.98 million tonnes 633.40 million tonnes 539.42 million tonnes Norway
1900s 130.74 million tonnes 794.14 million tonnes 663.40 million tonnes Norway
1910s 196.19 million tonnes 968.99 million tonnes 772.80 million tonnes Norway
1920s 277.87 million tonnes 1.14 billion tonnes 861.30 million tonnes Norway
1930s 430.15 million tonnes 1.31 billion tonnes 881.06 million tonnes Norway
1940s 782.14 million tonnes 1.45 billion tonnes 669.58 million tonnes Norway
1950s 1.34 billion tonnes 1.57 billion tonnes 232.84 million tonnes Norway
1960s 1.75 billion tonnes 1.63 billion tonnes 126.13 million tonnes Guatemala
1970s 2.01 billion tonnes 1.78 billion tonnes 221.39 million tonnes Guatemala
1980s 2.43 billion tonnes 2.07 billion tonnes 355.23 million tonnes Guatemala
1990s 2.99 billion tonnes 2.44 billion tonnes 546.83 million tonnes Guatemala
2000s 3.62 billion tonnes 2.89 billion tonnes 735.72 million tonnes Guatemala
2010s 4.05 billion tonnes 3.37 billion tonnes 682.09 million tonnes Guatemala
2020s 4.42 billion tonnes 3.74 billion tonnes 676.53 million tonnes Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled, Guatemala or Norway?
Guatemala, at 4.51 billion tonnes against 3.83 billion tonnes in Norway as of 2024.
What is the difference in cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled between Guatemala and Norway?
681.28 million tonnes, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Norway?
155 years are reported by both, from 1870 to 2024.
How do Guatemala and Norway rank globally for cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled?
Guatemala ranks 68th and Norway ranks 71st of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Norway: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-including-land-use-change-gaps-filled/guatemala/norway/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-including-land-use-change-gaps-filled/guatemala/norway/">Guatemala vs Norway: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled
Unit
tonnes
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
194 places, 21,015 data points, 1850–2024
Last refreshed

Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change with 79 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.