Honduras vs Norway: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled

Honduras
3.58 billion tonnes
in 2024
Norway
3.83 billion tonnes
in 2024
Honduras rank
73rd
Norway rank
71st

Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled over time

  • Honduras
  • Norway
01.0B2.0B3.0B4.0B185019372024

How they compare

Norway currently reports 3.83 billion tonnes against 3.58 billion tonnes in Honduras, a difference of 249.87 million tonnes.

That makes Norway's figure about 1.1 times Honduras's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 155 shared years of data; in 1870 it was Norway ahead.

Honduras ranks 73rd and Norway ranks 71st of 194 countries.

Across the 16 decades both report, Honduras averaged higher in 6 and Norway in 10.

Head to head by decade

Decade Honduras Norway Difference Ahead
1870s 19.65 million tonnes 348.03 million tonnes 328.39 million tonnes Norway
1880s 56.44 million tonnes 486.19 million tonnes 429.75 million tonnes Norway
1890s 87.02 million tonnes 633.40 million tonnes 546.38 million tonnes Norway
1900s 121.04 million tonnes 794.14 million tonnes 673.10 million tonnes Norway
1910s 175.49 million tonnes 968.99 million tonnes 793.50 million tonnes Norway
1920s 334.46 million tonnes 1.14 billion tonnes 804.70 million tonnes Norway
1930s 640.44 million tonnes 1.31 billion tonnes 670.76 million tonnes Norway
1940s 1.09 billion tonnes 1.45 billion tonnes 359.07 million tonnes Norway
1950s 1.69 billion tonnes 1.57 billion tonnes 117.02 million tonnes Honduras
1960s 2.17 billion tonnes 1.63 billion tonnes 543.92 million tonnes Honduras
1970s 2.42 billion tonnes 1.78 billion tonnes 634.73 million tonnes Honduras
1980s 2.66 billion tonnes 2.07 billion tonnes 590.83 million tonnes Honduras
1990s 2.93 billion tonnes 2.44 billion tonnes 493.65 million tonnes Honduras
2000s 3.14 billion tonnes 2.89 billion tonnes 248.97 million tonnes Honduras
2010s 3.35 billion tonnes 3.37 billion tonnes 23.88 million tonnes Norway
2020s 3.53 billion tonnes 3.74 billion tonnes 207.12 million tonnes Norway

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled, Honduras or Norway?
Norway, at 3.83 billion tonnes against 3.58 billion tonnes in Honduras as of 2024.
What is the difference in cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled between Honduras and Norway?
249.87 million tonnes, with Norway ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Honduras and Norway?
155 years are reported by both, from 1870 to 2024.
How do Honduras and Norway rank globally for cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled?
Honduras ranks 73rd and Norway ranks 71st of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Honduras vs Norway: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-including-land-use-change-gaps-filled/honduras/norway/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-including-land-use-change-gaps-filled/honduras/norway/">Honduras vs Norway: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled
Unit
tonnes
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
194 places, 21,015 data points, 1850–2024
Last refreshed

Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change with 79 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.