Kazakhstan vs Malaysia: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled

Kazakhstan
18.97 billion tonnes
in 2024
Malaysia
20.00 billion tonnes
in 2024
Kazakhstan rank
27th
Malaysia rank
24th

Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled over time

  • Kazakhstan
  • Malaysia
05.0B10.0B15.0B20.0B185019372024

How they compare

Malaysia currently reports 20.00 billion tonnes against 18.97 billion tonnes in Kazakhstan, a difference of 1.03 billion tonnes.

That makes Malaysia's figure about 1.1 times Kazakhstan's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 135 shared years of data; in 1890 it was Kazakhstan ahead.

Kazakhstan ranks 27th and Malaysia ranks 24th of 194 countries.

Across the 14 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 10 and Malaysia in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kazakhstan Malaysia Difference Ahead
1890s 939.86 million tonnes 141.16 million tonnes 798.70 million tonnes Kazakhstan
1900s 1.24 billion tonnes 450.75 million tonnes 793.66 million tonnes Kazakhstan
1910s 1.58 billion tonnes 1.02 billion tonnes 556.22 million tonnes Kazakhstan
1920s 1.88 billion tonnes 1.65 billion tonnes 226.77 million tonnes Kazakhstan
1930s 2.06 billion tonnes 2.07 billion tonnes 5.18 million tonnes Malaysia
1940s 2.29 billion tonnes 2.82 billion tonnes 534.10 million tonnes Malaysia
1950s 3.83 billion tonnes 3.46 billion tonnes 360.54 million tonnes Kazakhstan
1960s 6.37 billion tonnes 4.01 billion tonnes 2.36 billion tonnes Kazakhstan
1970s 8.47 billion tonnes 5.40 billion tonnes 3.08 billion tonnes Kazakhstan
1980s 10.85 billion tonnes 7.55 billion tonnes 3.31 billion tonnes Kazakhstan
1990s 13.11 billion tonnes 10.40 billion tonnes 2.70 billion tonnes Kazakhstan
2000s 14.20 billion tonnes 12.88 billion tonnes 1.32 billion tonnes Kazakhstan
2010s 16.33 billion tonnes 16.54 billion tonnes 205.59 million tonnes Malaysia
2020s 18.42 billion tonnes 19.31 billion tonnes 884.56 million tonnes Malaysia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled, Kazakhstan or Malaysia?
Malaysia, at 20.00 billion tonnes against 18.97 billion tonnes in Kazakhstan as of 2024.
What is the difference in cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled between Kazakhstan and Malaysia?
1.03 billion tonnes, with Malaysia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Malaysia?
135 years are reported by both, from 1890 to 2024.
How do Kazakhstan and Malaysia rank globally for cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled?
Kazakhstan ranks 27th and Malaysia ranks 24th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kazakhstan vs Malaysia: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-including-land-use-change-gaps-filled/kazakhstan/malaysia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-including-land-use-change-gaps-filled/kazakhstan/malaysia/">Kazakhstan vs Malaysia: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled
Unit
tonnes
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
194 places, 21,015 data points, 1850–2024
Last refreshed

Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change with 79 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.