North Korea vs Uzbekistan: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled

North Korea
7.02 billion tonnes
in 2024
Uzbekistan
7.14 billion tonnes
in 2024
North Korea rank
49th
Uzbekistan rank
48th

Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled over time

  • North Korea
  • Uzbekistan
02.0B4.0B6.0B8.0B185019372024

How they compare

Uzbekistan currently reports 7.14 billion tonnes against 7.02 billion tonnes in North Korea, a difference of 115.93 million tonnes.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 120 shared years of data; in 1905 it was Uzbekistan ahead.

North Korea ranks 49th and Uzbekistan ranks 48th of 194 countries.

Across the 13 decades both report, North Korea averaged higher in 9 and Uzbekistan in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade North Korea Uzbekistan Difference Ahead
1900s 3.72 million tonnes 146.56 million tonnes 142.85 million tonnes Uzbekistan
1910s 61.25 million tonnes 185.19 million tonnes 123.94 million tonnes Uzbekistan
1920s 206.59 million tonnes 228.36 million tonnes 21.76 million tonnes Uzbekistan
1930s 403.88 million tonnes 300.65 million tonnes 103.23 million tonnes North Korea
1940s 678.19 million tonnes 424.11 million tonnes 254.08 million tonnes North Korea
1950s 857.76 million tonnes 688.64 million tonnes 169.12 million tonnes North Korea
1960s 1.20 billion tonnes 1.17 billion tonnes 24.08 million tonnes North Korea
1970s 2.05 billion tonnes 1.81 billion tonnes 244.75 million tonnes North Korea
1980s 3.39 billion tonnes 2.68 billion tonnes 709.70 million tonnes North Korea
1990s 4.79 billion tonnes 3.72 billion tonnes 1.07 billion tonnes North Korea
2000s 5.64 billion tonnes 4.92 billion tonnes 721.49 million tonnes North Korea
2010s 6.38 billion tonnes 6.05 billion tonnes 325.49 million tonnes North Korea
2020s 6.88 billion tonnes 6.88 billion tonnes 1.16 million tonnes Uzbekistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled, North Korea or Uzbekistan?
Uzbekistan, at 7.14 billion tonnes against 7.02 billion tonnes in North Korea as of 2024.
What is the difference in cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled between North Korea and Uzbekistan?
115.93 million tonnes, with Uzbekistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for North Korea and Uzbekistan?
120 years are reported by both, from 1905 to 2024.
How do North Korea and Uzbekistan rank globally for cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled?
North Korea ranks 49th and Uzbekistan ranks 48th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

North Korea vs Uzbekistan: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-including-land-use-change-gaps-filled/korea-dem-people-s-rep/uzbekistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-including-land-use-change-gaps-filled/korea-dem-people-s-rep/uzbekistan/">North Korea vs Uzbekistan: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled
Unit
tonnes
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
194 places, 21,015 data points, 1850–2024
Last refreshed

Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change with 79 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.