Lithuania vs Zimbabwe: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled

Lithuania
2.87 billion tonnes
in 2024
Zimbabwe
2.93 billion tonnes
in 2024
Lithuania rank
84th
Zimbabwe rank
81st

Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled over time

  • Lithuania
  • Zimbabwe
01.0B2.0B3.0B185019372024

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 2.93 billion tonnes against 2.87 billion tonnes in Lithuania, a difference of 68.16 million tonnes.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 122 shared years of data; in 1903 it was Lithuania ahead.

Lithuania ranks 84th and Zimbabwe ranks 81st of 194 countries.

Across the 13 decades both report, Lithuania averaged higher in 11 and Zimbabwe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lithuania Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1900s 1.10 billion tonnes 13.05 million tonnes 1.09 billion tonnes Lithuania
1910s 1.26 billion tonnes 49.10 million tonnes 1.21 billion tonnes Lithuania
1920s 1.39 billion tonnes 116.71 million tonnes 1.28 billion tonnes Lithuania
1930s 1.54 billion tonnes 216.53 million tonnes 1.32 billion tonnes Lithuania
1940s 1.70 billion tonnes 366.16 million tonnes 1.33 billion tonnes Lithuania
1950s 1.79 billion tonnes 572.24 million tonnes 1.22 billion tonnes Lithuania
1960s 1.84 billion tonnes 803.53 million tonnes 1.04 billion tonnes Lithuania
1970s 2.00 billion tonnes 1.07 billion tonnes 931.49 million tonnes Lithuania
1980s 2.30 billion tonnes 1.41 billion tonnes 897.81 million tonnes Lithuania
1990s 2.59 billion tonnes 1.91 billion tonnes 683.96 million tonnes Lithuania
2000s 2.67 billion tonnes 2.48 billion tonnes 187.21 million tonnes Lithuania
2010s 2.76 billion tonnes 2.81 billion tonnes 58.05 million tonnes Zimbabwe
2020s 2.84 billion tonnes 2.91 billion tonnes 67.30 million tonnes Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled, Lithuania or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 2.93 billion tonnes against 2.87 billion tonnes in Lithuania as of 2024.
What is the difference in cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled between Lithuania and Zimbabwe?
68.16 million tonnes, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Zimbabwe?
122 years are reported by both, from 1903 to 2024.
How do Lithuania and Zimbabwe rank globally for cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled?
Lithuania ranks 84th and Zimbabwe ranks 81st of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lithuania vs Zimbabwe: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-including-land-use-change-gaps-filled/lithuania/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-including-land-use-change-gaps-filled/lithuania/zimbabwe/">Lithuania vs Zimbabwe: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled
Unit
tonnes
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
194 places, 21,015 data points, 1850–2024
Last refreshed

Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change with 79 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.