Malawi vs Slovenia: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled

Malawi
1.19 billion tonnes
in 2024
Slovenia
1.22 billion tonnes
in 2024
Malawi rank
120th
Slovenia rank
119th

Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled over time

  • Malawi
  • Slovenia
0250.0M500.0M750.0M1.0B1.2B188519542024

How they compare

Slovenia currently reports 1.22 billion tonnes against 1.19 billion tonnes in Malawi, a difference of 29.42 million tonnes.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 75 shared years of data; in 1950 it was Slovenia ahead.

Malawi ranks 120th and Slovenia ranks 119th of 194 countries.

Across the 8 decades both report, Malawi averaged higher in 5 and Slovenia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malawi Slovenia Difference Ahead
1950s 77.89 million tonnes 246.99 million tonnes 169.10 million tonnes Slovenia
1960s 276.62 million tonnes 312.47 million tonnes 35.85 million tonnes Slovenia
1970s 493.72 million tonnes 411.95 million tonnes 81.77 million tonnes Malawi
1980s 593.65 million tonnes 552.00 million tonnes 41.65 million tonnes Malawi
1990s 702.60 million tonnes 701.31 million tonnes 1.29 million tonnes Malawi
2000s 900.71 million tonnes 860.87 million tonnes 39.84 million tonnes Malawi
2010s 1.07 billion tonnes 1.06 billion tonnes 11.12 million tonnes Malawi
2020s 1.16 billion tonnes 1.19 billion tonnes 21.64 million tonnes Slovenia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled, Malawi or Slovenia?
Slovenia, at 1.22 billion tonnes against 1.19 billion tonnes in Malawi as of 2024.
What is the difference in cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled between Malawi and Slovenia?
29.42 million tonnes, with Slovenia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Slovenia?
75 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2024.
How do Malawi and Slovenia rank globally for cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled?
Malawi ranks 120th and Slovenia ranks 119th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malawi vs Slovenia: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-including-land-use-change-gaps-filled/malawi/slovenia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-including-land-use-change-gaps-filled/malawi/slovenia/">Malawi vs Slovenia: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled
Unit
tonnes
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
194 places, 21,015 data points, 1850–2024
Last refreshed

Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change with 79 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.