Mexico vs South Africa: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled

Mexico
36.01 billion tonnes
in 2024
South Africa
29.70 billion tonnes
in 2024
Mexico rank
12th
South Africa rank
15th

Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled over time

  • Mexico
  • South Africa
010.0B20.0B30.0B40.0B185619402024

How they compare

Mexico currently reports 36.01 billion tonnes against 29.70 billion tonnes in South Africa, a difference of 6.31 billion tonnes.

That makes Mexico's figure about 1.2 times South Africa's.

Across all 141 years both countries report, Mexico has been ahead every year.

Mexico ranks 12th and South Africa ranks 15th of 194 countries.

Mexico has averaged higher in every one of the 15 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mexico South Africa Difference Ahead
1880s 1.02 billion tonnes 53.51 million tonnes 961.49 million tonnes Mexico
1890s 1.85 billion tonnes 224.89 million tonnes 1.62 billion tonnes Mexico
1900s 3.02 billion tonnes 563.28 million tonnes 2.46 billion tonnes Mexico
1910s 3.90 billion tonnes 1.04 billion tonnes 2.86 billion tonnes Mexico
1920s 4.91 billion tonnes 1.64 billion tonnes 3.27 billion tonnes Mexico
1930s 5.93 billion tonnes 2.34 billion tonnes 3.58 billion tonnes Mexico
1940s 7.43 billion tonnes 3.34 billion tonnes 4.09 billion tonnes Mexico
1950s 9.64 billion tonnes 4.80 billion tonnes 4.84 billion tonnes Mexico
1960s 11.58 billion tonnes 6.65 billion tonnes 4.93 billion tonnes Mexico
1970s 13.19 billion tonnes 8.93 billion tonnes 4.26 billion tonnes Mexico
1980s 16.41 billion tonnes 12.05 billion tonnes 4.36 billion tonnes Mexico
1990s 21.38 billion tonnes 16.14 billion tonnes 5.24 billion tonnes Mexico
2000s 26.52 billion tonnes 20.62 billion tonnes 5.90 billion tonnes Mexico
2010s 31.68 billion tonnes 25.42 billion tonnes 6.26 billion tonnes Mexico
2020s 35.16 billion tonnes 28.81 billion tonnes 6.34 billion tonnes Mexico

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled, Mexico or South Africa?
Mexico, at 36.01 billion tonnes against 29.70 billion tonnes in South Africa as of 2024.
What is the difference in cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled between Mexico and South Africa?
6.31 billion tonnes, with Mexico ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and South Africa?
141 years are reported by both, from 1884 to 2024.
How do Mexico and South Africa rank globally for cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled?
Mexico ranks 12th and South Africa ranks 15th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mexico vs South Africa: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-including-land-use-change-gaps-filled/mexico/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-including-land-use-change-gaps-filled/mexico/south-africa/">Mexico vs South Africa: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled
Unit
tonnes
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
194 places, 21,015 data points, 1850–2024
Last refreshed

Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change with 79 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.