Pakistan vs Sweden: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled

Pakistan
7.75 billion tonnes
in 2024
Sweden
7.56 billion tonnes
in 2024
Pakistan rank
43rd
Sweden rank
46th

Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled over time

  • Pakistan
  • Sweden
02.0B4.0B6.0B8.0B185019372024

How they compare

Pakistan currently reports 7.75 billion tonnes against 7.56 billion tonnes in Sweden, a difference of 193.31 million tonnes.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 79 shared years of data; in 1946 it was Sweden ahead.

Pakistan ranks 43rd and Sweden ranks 46th of 194 countries.

Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 9 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Pakistan Sweden Difference Ahead
1940s 177.87 million tonnes 3.80 billion tonnes 3.63 billion tonnes Sweden
1950s 723.44 million tonnes 4.13 billion tonnes 3.41 billion tonnes Sweden
1960s 1.54 billion tonnes 4.45 billion tonnes 2.91 billion tonnes Sweden
1970s 1.95 billion tonnes 4.99 billion tonnes 3.04 billion tonnes Sweden
1980s 2.50 billion tonnes 5.55 billion tonnes 3.05 billion tonnes Sweden
1990s 3.17 billion tonnes 6.03 billion tonnes 2.86 billion tonnes Sweden
2000s 4.36 billion tonnes 6.58 billion tonnes 2.22 billion tonnes Sweden
2010s 5.90 billion tonnes 7.11 billion tonnes 1.20 billion tonnes Sweden
2020s 7.39 billion tonnes 7.46 billion tonnes 73.62 million tonnes Sweden

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled, Pakistan or Sweden?
Pakistan, at 7.75 billion tonnes against 7.56 billion tonnes in Sweden as of 2024.
What is the difference in cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled between Pakistan and Sweden?
193.31 million tonnes, with Pakistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Pakistan and Sweden?
79 years are reported by both, from 1946 to 2024.
How do Pakistan and Sweden rank globally for cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled?
Pakistan ranks 43rd and Sweden ranks 46th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Pakistan vs Sweden: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-including-land-use-change-gaps-filled/pakistan/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-including-land-use-change-gaps-filled/pakistan/sweden/">Pakistan vs Sweden: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled
Unit
tonnes
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
194 places, 21,015 data points, 1850–2024
Last refreshed

Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change with 79 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.