Philippines vs Spain: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled

Philippines
15.28 billion tonnes
in 2024
Spain
17.73 billion tonnes
in 2024
Philippines rank
30th
Spain rank
28th

Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled over time

  • Philippines
  • Spain
05.0B10.0B15.0B20.0B185019372024

How they compare

Spain currently reports 17.73 billion tonnes against 15.28 billion tonnes in Philippines, a difference of 2.45 billion tonnes.

That makes Spain's figure about 1.2 times Philippines's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 118 shared years of data; in 1907 it was Spain ahead.

Philippines ranks 30th and Spain ranks 28th of 194 countries.

Across the 13 decades both report, Philippines averaged higher in 5 and Spain in 8.

Head to head by decade

Decade Philippines Spain Difference Ahead
1900s 188.43 million tonnes 1.46 billion tonnes 1.27 billion tonnes Spain
1910s 838.37 million tonnes 1.75 billion tonnes 908.17 million tonnes Spain
1920s 1.79 billion tonnes 2.27 billion tonnes 477.44 million tonnes Spain
1930s 2.62 billion tonnes 2.88 billion tonnes 263.04 million tonnes Spain
1940s 3.19 billion tonnes 3.40 billion tonnes 212.56 million tonnes Spain
1950s 4.12 billion tonnes 3.92 billion tonnes 202.22 million tonnes Philippines
1960s 5.93 billion tonnes 4.64 billion tonnes 1.29 billion tonnes Philippines
1970s 7.61 billion tonnes 5.96 billion tonnes 1.66 billion tonnes Philippines
1980s 9.59 billion tonnes 7.83 billion tonnes 1.76 billion tonnes Philippines
1990s 10.61 billion tonnes 9.93 billion tonnes 680.29 million tonnes Philippines
2000s 11.81 billion tonnes 12.74 billion tonnes 928.22 million tonnes Spain
2010s 13.50 billion tonnes 15.57 billion tonnes 2.08 billion tonnes Spain
2020s 14.87 billion tonnes 17.30 billion tonnes 2.43 billion tonnes Spain

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled, Philippines or Spain?
Spain, at 17.73 billion tonnes against 15.28 billion tonnes in Philippines as of 2024.
What is the difference in cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled between Philippines and Spain?
2.45 billion tonnes, with Spain ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Philippines and Spain?
118 years are reported by both, from 1907 to 2024.
How do Philippines and Spain rank globally for cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled?
Philippines ranks 30th and Spain ranks 28th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Philippines vs Spain: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-including-land-use-change-gaps-filled/philippines/spain/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-including-land-use-change-gaps-filled/philippines/spain/">Philippines vs Spain: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled
Unit
tonnes
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
194 places, 21,015 data points, 1850–2024
Last refreshed

Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change with 79 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.