Portugal vs Serbia: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled

Portugal
3.20 billion tonnes
in 2024
Serbia
3.37 billion tonnes
in 2024
Portugal rank
79th
Serbia rank
77th

Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled over time

  • Portugal
  • Serbia
01.0B2.0B3.0B187019472024

How they compare

Serbia currently reports 3.37 billion tonnes against 3.20 billion tonnes in Portugal, a difference of 178.59 million tonnes.

That makes Serbia's figure about 1.1 times Portugal's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 131 shared years of data; in 1885 it was Portugal ahead.

Portugal ranks 79th and Serbia ranks 77th of 194 countries.

Across the 15 decades both report, Portugal averaged higher in 2 and Serbia in 13.

Head to head by decade

Decade Portugal Serbia Difference Ahead
1880s 86.34 million tonnes 16.26 million tonnes 70.09 million tonnes Portugal
1890s 149.44 million tonnes 104.97 million tonnes 44.47 million tonnes Portugal
1900s 221.69 million tonnes 266.67 million tonnes 44.98 million tonnes Serbia
1910s 286.49 million tonnes 388.44 million tonnes 101.95 million tonnes Serbia
1920s 361.60 million tonnes 518.83 million tonnes 157.22 million tonnes Serbia
1930s 469.53 million tonnes 700.84 million tonnes 231.31 million tonnes Serbia
1940s 588.74 million tonnes 841.46 million tonnes 252.73 million tonnes Serbia
1950s 696.41 million tonnes 1.08 billion tonnes 380.19 million tonnes Serbia
1960s 810.54 million tonnes 1.37 billion tonnes 560.66 million tonnes Serbia
1970s 989.06 million tonnes 1.70 billion tonnes 708.19 million tonnes Serbia
1980s 1.27 billion tonnes 2.16 billion tonnes 893.04 million tonnes Serbia
1990s 1.68 billion tonnes 2.61 billion tonnes 929.00 million tonnes Serbia
2000s 2.25 billion tonnes 2.93 billion tonnes 683.76 million tonnes Serbia
2010s 2.76 billion tonnes 3.15 billion tonnes 392.44 million tonnes Serbia
2020s 3.11 billion tonnes 3.32 billion tonnes 209.29 million tonnes Serbia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled, Portugal or Serbia?
Serbia, at 3.37 billion tonnes against 3.20 billion tonnes in Portugal as of 2024.
What is the difference in cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled between Portugal and Serbia?
178.59 million tonnes, with Serbia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Portugal and Serbia?
131 years are reported by both, from 1885 to 2024.
How do Portugal and Serbia rank globally for cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled?
Portugal ranks 79th and Serbia ranks 77th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Portugal vs Serbia: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-including-land-use-change-gaps-filled/portugal/serbia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-including-land-use-change-gaps-filled/portugal/serbia/">Portugal vs Serbia: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled
Unit
tonnes
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
194 places, 21,015 data points, 1850–2024
Last refreshed

Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change with 79 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.