Serbia vs Switzerland: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled

Serbia
3.37 billion tonnes
in 2024
Switzerland
3.41 billion tonnes
in 2024
Serbia rank
77th
Switzerland rank
76th

Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled over time

  • Serbia
  • Switzerland
01.0B2.0B3.0B185819412024

How they compare

Switzerland currently reports 3.41 billion tonnes against 3.37 billion tonnes in Serbia, a difference of 38.82 million tonnes.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 131 shared years of data; in 1885 it was Switzerland ahead.

Serbia ranks 77th and Switzerland ranks 76th of 194 countries.

Across the 15 decades both report, Serbia averaged higher in 12 and Switzerland in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Serbia Switzerland Difference Ahead
1880s 16.26 million tonnes 105.23 million tonnes 88.97 million tonnes Switzerland
1890s 104.97 million tonnes 154.62 million tonnes 49.66 million tonnes Switzerland
1900s 266.67 million tonnes 240.23 million tonnes 26.44 million tonnes Serbia
1910s 388.44 million tonnes 333.96 million tonnes 54.48 million tonnes Serbia
1920s 518.83 million tonnes 437.32 million tonnes 81.50 million tonnes Serbia
1930s 700.84 million tonnes 538.29 million tonnes 162.55 million tonnes Serbia
1940s 841.46 million tonnes 627.00 million tonnes 214.47 million tonnes Serbia
1950s 1.08 billion tonnes 742.30 million tonnes 334.31 million tonnes Serbia
1960s 1.37 billion tonnes 974.08 million tonnes 397.12 million tonnes Serbia
1970s 1.70 billion tonnes 1.36 billion tonnes 339.99 million tonnes Serbia
1980s 2.16 billion tonnes 1.77 billion tonnes 393.09 million tonnes Serbia
1990s 2.61 billion tonnes 2.20 billion tonnes 411.37 million tonnes Serbia
2000s 2.93 billion tonnes 2.65 billion tonnes 281.81 million tonnes Serbia
2010s 3.15 billion tonnes 3.07 billion tonnes 74.22 million tonnes Serbia
2020s 3.32 billion tonnes 3.35 billion tonnes 25.43 million tonnes Switzerland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled, Serbia or Switzerland?
Switzerland, at 3.41 billion tonnes against 3.37 billion tonnes in Serbia as of 2024.
What is the difference in cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled between Serbia and Switzerland?
38.82 million tonnes, with Switzerland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Switzerland?
131 years are reported by both, from 1885 to 2024.
How do Serbia and Switzerland rank globally for cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled?
Serbia ranks 77th and Switzerland ranks 76th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Serbia vs Switzerland: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-including-land-use-change-gaps-filled/serbia/switzerland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-including-land-use-change-gaps-filled/serbia/switzerland/">Serbia vs Switzerland: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled
Unit
tonnes
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
194 places, 21,015 data points, 1850–2024
Last refreshed

Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change with 79 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.