Belarus vs Philippines: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, per square

Belarus
49,363 tonnes per square kilometre
in 2023
Philippines
50,524 tonnes per square kilometre
in 2023
Belarus rank
42nd
Philippines rank
40th

Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, per square over time

  • Belarus
  • Philippines
020.0k40.0k60.0k196119922023

How they compare

Philippines currently reports 50,524 tonnes per square kilometre against 49,363 tonnes per square kilometre in Belarus, a difference of 1,161 tonnes per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Belarus ahead.

Belarus ranks 42nd and Philippines ranks 40th of 192 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 3 and Philippines in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Philippines Difference Ahead
1990s 40,805 tonnes per square kilometre 35,922 tonnes per square kilometre 4,883 tonnes per square kilometre Belarus
2000s 43,704 tonnes per square kilometre 39,613 tonnes per square kilometre 4,091 tonnes per square kilometre Belarus
2010s 46,857 tonnes per square kilometre 45,262 tonnes per square kilometre 1,595 tonnes per square kilometre Belarus
2020s 48,963 tonnes per square kilometre 49,538 tonnes per square kilometre 575.37 tonnes per square kilometre Philippines

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, per square, Belarus or Philippines?
Philippines, at 50,524 tonnes per square kilometre against 49,363 tonnes per square kilometre in Belarus as of 2023.
What is the difference in cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, per square between Belarus and Philippines?
1,161 tonnes per square kilometre, with Philippines ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Philippines?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Belarus and Philippines rank globally for cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, per square?
Belarus ranks 42nd and Philippines ranks 40th of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Philippines: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-including-land-use-change-per-square-kilometre/belarus/philippines/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-including-land-use-change-per-square-kilometre/belarus/philippines/">Belarus vs Philippines: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, per square kilometre
Unit
tonnes per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
192 places, 10,796 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.