Georgia vs Kiribati: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, per square

Georgia
3,286 tonnes per square kilometre
in 2023
Kiribati
2,786 tonnes per square kilometre
in 2023
Georgia rank
170th
Kiribati rank
172nd

Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, per square over time

  • Georgia
  • Kiribati
01.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k196119922023

How they compare

Georgia currently reports 3,286 tonnes per square kilometre against 2,786 tonnes per square kilometre in Kiribati, a difference of 500 tonnes per square kilometre.

That makes Georgia's figure about 1.2 times Kiribati's.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Georgia has been ahead every year.

Georgia ranks 170th and Kiribati ranks 172nd of 192 countries.

Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Georgia Kiribati Difference Ahead
1990s 3,778 tonnes per square kilometre 1,029 tonnes per square kilometre 2,749 tonnes per square kilometre Georgia
2000s 3,447 tonnes per square kilometre 1,438 tonnes per square kilometre 2,009 tonnes per square kilometre Georgia
2010s 3,069 tonnes per square kilometre 2,092 tonnes per square kilometre 977.52 tonnes per square kilometre Georgia
2020s 3,190 tonnes per square kilometre 2,657 tonnes per square kilometre 532.38 tonnes per square kilometre Georgia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, per square, Georgia or Kiribati?
Georgia, at 3,286 tonnes per square kilometre against 2,786 tonnes per square kilometre in Kiribati as of 2023.
What is the difference in cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, per square between Georgia and Kiribati?
500 tonnes per square kilometre, with Georgia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Kiribati?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Georgia and Kiribati rank globally for cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, per square?
Georgia ranks 170th and Kiribati ranks 172nd of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Georgia vs Kiribati: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-including-land-use-change-per-square-kilometre/georgia/kiribati/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-including-land-use-change-per-square-kilometre/georgia/kiribati/">Georgia vs Kiribati: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, per square kilometre
Unit
tonnes per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
192 places, 10,796 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.