Guatemala vs Indonesia: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, per square

Guatemala
41,665 tonnes per square kilometre
in 2023
Indonesia
45,202 tonnes per square kilometre
in 2023
Guatemala rank
51st
Indonesia rank
48th

Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, per square over time

  • Guatemala
  • Indonesia
10.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k50.0k196119922023

How they compare

Indonesia currently reports 45,202 tonnes per square kilometre against 41,665 tonnes per square kilometre in Guatemala, a difference of 3,537 tonnes per square kilometre.

That makes Indonesia's figure about 1.1 times Guatemala's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Guatemala ahead.

Guatemala ranks 51st and Indonesia ranks 48th of 192 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 5 and Indonesia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Indonesia Difference Ahead
1960s 16,481 tonnes per square kilometre 12,992 tonnes per square kilometre 3,489 tonnes per square kilometre Guatemala
1970s 18,717 tonnes per square kilometre 15,948 tonnes per square kilometre 2,769 tonnes per square kilometre Guatemala
1980s 22,634 tonnes per square kilometre 20,352 tonnes per square kilometre 2,282 tonnes per square kilometre Guatemala
1990s 27,867 tonnes per square kilometre 26,185 tonnes per square kilometre 1,682 tonnes per square kilometre Guatemala
2000s 33,815 tonnes per square kilometre 31,054 tonnes per square kilometre 2,761 tonnes per square kilometre Guatemala
2010s 37,831 tonnes per square kilometre 38,802 tonnes per square kilometre 971.06 tonnes per square kilometre Indonesia
2020s 40,986 tonnes per square kilometre 44,202 tonnes per square kilometre 3,216 tonnes per square kilometre Indonesia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, per square, Guatemala or Indonesia?
Indonesia, at 45,202 tonnes per square kilometre against 41,665 tonnes per square kilometre in Guatemala as of 2023.
What is the difference in cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, per square between Guatemala and Indonesia?
3,537 tonnes per square kilometre, with Indonesia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Indonesia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Guatemala and Indonesia rank globally for cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, per square?
Guatemala ranks 51st and Indonesia ranks 48th of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Indonesia: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-including-land-use-change-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/indonesia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-including-land-use-change-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/indonesia/">Guatemala vs Indonesia: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, per square kilometre
Unit
tonnes per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
192 places, 10,796 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.