Guatemala vs Serbia: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, per square

Guatemala
41,665 tonnes per square kilometre
in 2023
Serbia
39,831 tonnes per square kilometre
in 2023
Guatemala rank
51st
Serbia rank
54th

Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, per square over time

  • Guatemala
  • Serbia
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k196119922023

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 41,665 tonnes per square kilometre against 39,831 tonnes per square kilometre in Serbia, a difference of 1,834 tonnes per square kilometre.

Across all 18 years both countries report, Guatemala has been ahead every year.

Guatemala ranks 51st and Serbia ranks 54th of 192 countries.

Guatemala has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Serbia Difference Ahead
2000s 35,196 tonnes per square kilometre 34,423 tonnes per square kilometre 773 tonnes per square kilometre Guatemala
2010s 37,831 tonnes per square kilometre 35,999 tonnes per square kilometre 1,831 tonnes per square kilometre Guatemala
2020s 40,986 tonnes per square kilometre 39,369 tonnes per square kilometre 1,617 tonnes per square kilometre Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, per square, Guatemala or Serbia?
Guatemala, at 41,665 tonnes per square kilometre against 39,831 tonnes per square kilometre in Serbia as of 2023.
What is the difference in cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, per square between Guatemala and Serbia?
1,834 tonnes per square kilometre, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Serbia?
18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
How do Guatemala and Serbia rank globally for cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, per square?
Guatemala ranks 51st and Serbia ranks 54th of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Serbia: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-including-land-use-change-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/serbia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-including-land-use-change-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/serbia/">Guatemala vs Serbia: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, per square kilometre
Unit
tonnes per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
192 places, 10,796 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.