Iceland vs Kiribati: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, per square

Iceland
2,682 tonnes per square kilometre
in 2023
Kiribati
2,786 tonnes per square kilometre
in 2023
Iceland rank
173rd
Kiribati rank
172nd

Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, per square over time

  • Iceland
  • Kiribati
01.0k2.0k3.0k196119922023

How they compare

Kiribati currently reports 2,786 tonnes per square kilometre against 2,682 tonnes per square kilometre in Iceland, a difference of 104 tonnes per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Iceland ahead.

Iceland ranks 173rd and Kiribati ranks 172nd of 192 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Iceland averaged higher in 6 and Kiribati in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iceland Kiribati Difference Ahead
1960s 993.32 tonnes per square kilometre 86.95 tonnes per square kilometre 906.37 tonnes per square kilometre Iceland
1970s 1,240 tonnes per square kilometre 370.92 tonnes per square kilometre 868.87 tonnes per square kilometre Iceland
1980s 1,453 tonnes per square kilometre 692.99 tonnes per square kilometre 760.08 tonnes per square kilometre Iceland
1990s 1,688 tonnes per square kilometre 994.26 tonnes per square kilometre 693.92 tonnes per square kilometre Iceland
2000s 1,992 tonnes per square kilometre 1,438 tonnes per square kilometre 553.21 tonnes per square kilometre Iceland
2010s 2,368 tonnes per square kilometre 2,092 tonnes per square kilometre 276.29 tonnes per square kilometre Iceland
2020s 2,624 tonnes per square kilometre 2,657 tonnes per square kilometre 33.2 tonnes per square kilometre Kiribati

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, per square, Iceland or Kiribati?
Kiribati, at 2,786 tonnes per square kilometre against 2,682 tonnes per square kilometre in Iceland as of 2023.
What is the difference in cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, per square between Iceland and Kiribati?
104 tonnes per square kilometre, with Kiribati ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Kiribati?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Iceland and Kiribati rank globally for cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, per square?
Iceland ranks 173rd and Kiribati ranks 172nd of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iceland vs Kiribati: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-including-land-use-change-per-square-kilometre/iceland/kiribati/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-including-land-use-change-per-square-kilometre/iceland/kiribati/">Iceland vs Kiribati: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, per square kilometre
Unit
tonnes per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
192 places, 10,796 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.