Mauritania vs Namibia: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, per square

Mauritania
133.94 tonnes per square kilometre
in 2023
Namibia
257.18 tonnes per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritania rank
191st
Namibia rank
190th

Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, per square over time

  • Mauritania
  • Namibia
0100200300196119922023

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 257.18 tonnes per square kilometre against 133.94 tonnes per square kilometre in Mauritania, a difference of 123.24 tonnes per square kilometre.

That makes Namibia's figure about 1.9 times Mauritania's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 33 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Mauritania ahead.

Mauritania ranks 191st and Namibia ranks 190th of 192 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Mauritania averaged higher in 1 and Namibia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritania Namibia Difference Ahead
1990s 52.64 tonnes per square kilometre 37.02 tonnes per square kilometre 15.63 tonnes per square kilometre Mauritania
2000s 71.19 tonnes per square kilometre 97.25 tonnes per square kilometre 26.05 tonnes per square kilometre Namibia
2010s 97.33 tonnes per square kilometre 172.52 tonnes per square kilometre 75.19 tonnes per square kilometre Namibia
2020s 126.14 tonnes per square kilometre 239.77 tonnes per square kilometre 113.63 tonnes per square kilometre Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, per square, Mauritania or Namibia?
Namibia, at 257.18 tonnes per square kilometre against 133.94 tonnes per square kilometre in Mauritania as of 2023.
What is the difference in cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, per square between Mauritania and Namibia?
123.24 tonnes per square kilometre, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania and Namibia?
33 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2023.
How do Mauritania and Namibia rank globally for cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, per square?
Mauritania ranks 191st and Namibia ranks 190th of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritania vs Namibia: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-including-land-use-change-per-square-kilometre/mauritania/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-including-land-use-change-per-square-kilometre/mauritania/namibia/">Mauritania vs Namibia: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, per square kilometre
Unit
tonnes per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
192 places, 10,796 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.