East Timor vs Zimbabwe: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, per square

East Timor
7,860 tonnes per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
7,555 tonnes per square kilometre
in 2023
East Timor rank
135th
Zimbabwe rank
138th

Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, per square over time

  • East Timor
  • Zimbabwe
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k196119922023

How they compare

East Timor currently reports 7,860 tonnes per square kilometre against 7,555 tonnes per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 305 tonnes per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 30 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

East Timor ranks 135th and Zimbabwe ranks 138th of 192 countries.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Timor Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 1,039 tonnes per square kilometre 5,231 tonnes per square kilometre 4,192 tonnes per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 2,734 tonnes per square kilometre 6,419 tonnes per square kilometre 3,684 tonnes per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2010s 5,214 tonnes per square kilometre 7,276 tonnes per square kilometre 2,062 tonnes per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2020s 7,375 tonnes per square kilometre 7,508 tonnes per square kilometre 133.03 tonnes per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, per square, East Timor or Zimbabwe?
East Timor, at 7,860 tonnes per square kilometre against 7,555 tonnes per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, per square between East Timor and Zimbabwe?
305 tonnes per square kilometre, with East Timor ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Timor and Zimbabwe?
30 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2023.
How do East Timor and Zimbabwe rank globally for cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, per square?
East Timor ranks 135th and Zimbabwe ranks 138th of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Timor vs Zimbabwe: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-including-land-use-change-per-square-kilometre/timor-leste/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-including-land-use-change-per-square-kilometre/timor-leste/zimbabwe/">East Timor vs Zimbabwe: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, per square kilometre
Unit
tonnes per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
192 places, 10,796 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.