Central African Republic vs Nicaragua: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, per unit of GDP

Central African Republic
0.2747 tonnes per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Nicaragua
0.2298 tonnes per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Central African Republic rank
3rd
Nicaragua rank
6th

Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, per unit of GDP over time

  • Central African Republic
  • Nicaragua
02.557.510196019922024

How they compare

Central African Republic currently reports 0.2747 tonnes per US$ of GDP against 0.2298 tonnes per US$ of GDP in Nicaragua, a difference of 0.0449 tonnes per US$ of GDP.

That makes Central African Republic's figure about 1.2 times Nicaragua's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 65 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Nicaragua ahead.

Central African Republic ranks 3rd and Nicaragua ranks 6th of 191 countries.

Nicaragua has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central African Republic Nicaragua Difference Ahead
1960s 0.8254 tonnes per US$ of GDP 6.44 tonnes per US$ of GDP 5.61 tonnes per US$ of GDP Nicaragua
1970s 0.5663 tonnes per US$ of GDP 2.12 tonnes per US$ of GDP 1.56 tonnes per US$ of GDP Nicaragua
1980s 0.2857 tonnes per US$ of GDP 1.28 tonnes per US$ of GDP 0.9912 tonnes per US$ of GDP Nicaragua
1990s 0.2753 tonnes per US$ of GDP 1.37 tonnes per US$ of GDP 1.09 tonnes per US$ of GDP Nicaragua
2000s 0.2839 tonnes per US$ of GDP 0.6613 tonnes per US$ of GDP 0.3774 tonnes per US$ of GDP Nicaragua
2010s 0.2221 tonnes per US$ of GDP 0.3796 tonnes per US$ of GDP 0.1575 tonnes per US$ of GDP Nicaragua
2020s 0.267 tonnes per US$ of GDP 0.2875 tonnes per US$ of GDP 0.0205 tonnes per US$ of GDP Nicaragua

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, per unit of gdp, Central African Republic or Nicaragua?
Central African Republic, at 0.2747 tonnes per US$ of GDP against 0.2298 tonnes per US$ of GDP in Nicaragua as of 2024.
What is the difference in cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, per unit of gdp between Central African Republic and Nicaragua?
0.0449 tonnes per US$ of GDP, with Central African Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Nicaragua?
65 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2024.
How do Central African Republic and Nicaragua rank globally for cumulative co₂ emissions including land-use change, per unit of gdp?
Central African Republic ranks 3rd and Nicaragua ranks 6th of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central African Republic vs Nicaragua: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-including-land-use-change-per-unit-of-gdp/central-african-republic/nicaragua/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-including-land-use-change-per-unit-of-gdp/central-african-republic/nicaragua/">Central African Republic vs Nicaragua: Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change, per unit of GDP
Unit
tonnes per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
191 places, 10,578 data points, 1960–2024
Last refreshed

Cumulative CO₂ emissions including land-use change divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.