Norway vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Cumulative CO₂ emissions, per square kilometre

Norway
7,550 tonnes per square kilometre
in 2023
Turks and Caicos Islands
7,607 tonnes per square kilometre
in 2023
Norway rank
105th
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
104th

Cumulative CO₂ emissions, per square kilometre over time

  • Norway
  • Turks and Caicos Islands
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k196119922023

How they compare

Turks and Caicos Islands currently reports 7,607 tonnes per square kilometre against 7,550 tonnes per square kilometre in Norway, a difference of 57 tonnes per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Norway ahead.

Norway ranks 105th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 104th of 204 countries.

Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Norway Turks and Caicos Islands Difference Ahead
1990s 4,172 tonnes per square kilometre 390.7 tonnes per square kilometre 3,782 tonnes per square kilometre Norway
2000s 5,322 tonnes per square kilometre 1,690 tonnes per square kilometre 3,632 tonnes per square kilometre Norway
2010s 6,542 tonnes per square kilometre 4,489 tonnes per square kilometre 2,053 tonnes per square kilometre Norway
2020s 7,385 tonnes per square kilometre 7,030 tonnes per square kilometre 355.15 tonnes per square kilometre Norway

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cumulative co₂ emissions, per square kilometre, Norway or Turks and Caicos Islands?
Turks and Caicos Islands, at 7,607 tonnes per square kilometre against 7,550 tonnes per square kilometre in Norway as of 2023.
What is the difference in cumulative co₂ emissions, per square kilometre between Norway and Turks and Caicos Islands?
57 tonnes per square kilometre, with Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Norway and Turks and Caicos Islands?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Norway and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for cumulative co₂ emissions, per square kilometre?
Norway ranks 105th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 104th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Cumulative CO₂ emissions, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Norway vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Cumulative CO₂ emissions, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 21 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-per-square-kilometre/norway/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-emissions-per-square-kilometre/norway/turks-and-caicos-islands/">Norway vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Cumulative CO₂ emissions, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cumulative CO₂ emissions, per square kilometre
Unit
tonnes per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
204 places, 11,422 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Cumulative CO₂ emissions divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.