Barbados vs Dominica: Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change

Barbados
3.41 million tonnes
in 2024
Dominica
2.34 million tonnes
in 2024
Barbados rank
163rd
Dominica rank
164th

Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change over time

  • Barbados
  • Dominica
02.0M4.0M6.0M185019372024

How they compare

Barbados currently reports 3.41 million tonnes against 2.34 million tonnes in Dominica, a difference of 1.07 million tonnes.

That makes Barbados's figure about 1.5 times Dominica's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 175 shared years of data; in 1850 it was Dominica ahead.

Barbados ranks 163rd and Dominica ranks 164th of 197 countries.

Across the 18 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 9 and Dominica in 9.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados Dominica Difference Ahead
1850s 272,558 tonnes 402,963 tonnes 130,405 tonnes Dominica
1860s 726,307 tonnes 1.03 million tonnes 301,114 tonnes Dominica
1870s 1.16 million tonnes 1.33 million tonnes 167,452 tonnes Dominica
1880s 1.58 million tonnes 1.19 million tonnes 389,106 tonnes Barbados
1890s 1.97 million tonnes 1.14 million tonnes 825,573 tonnes Barbados
1900s 2.28 million tonnes 1.86 million tonnes 423,043 tonnes Barbados
1910s 2.51 million tonnes 2.30 million tonnes 204,470 tonnes Barbados
1920s 2.73 million tonnes 2.32 million tonnes 411,562 tonnes Barbados
1930s 2.98 million tonnes 3.16 million tonnes 184,893 tonnes Dominica
1940s 3.32 million tonnes 4.34 million tonnes 1.01 million tonnes Dominica
1950s 4.14 million tonnes 4.19 million tonnes 46,264 tonnes Dominica
1960s 4.60 million tonnes 5.14 million tonnes 541,577 tonnes Dominica
1970s 4.84 million tonnes 5.54 million tonnes 706,164 tonnes Dominica
1980s 4.99 million tonnes 5.30 million tonnes 307,772 tonnes Dominica
1990s 5.05 million tonnes 5.04 million tonnes 8,106 tonnes Barbados
2000s 4.97 million tonnes 4.76 million tonnes 210,267 tonnes Barbados
2010s 4.35 million tonnes 3.43 million tonnes 925,309 tonnes Barbados
2020s 3.56 million tonnes 2.53 million tonnes 1.02 million tonnes Barbados

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cumulative co₂ emissions from land-use change, Barbados or Dominica?
Barbados, at 3.41 million tonnes against 2.34 million tonnes in Dominica as of 2024.
What is the difference in cumulative co₂ emissions from land-use change between Barbados and Dominica?
1.07 million tonnes, with Barbados ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Dominica?
175 years are reported by both, from 1850 to 2024.
How do Barbados and Dominica rank globally for cumulative co₂ emissions from land-use change?
Barbados ranks 163rd and Dominica ranks 164th of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Global Carbon Budget (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs Dominica: Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change. Statizoid, drawing on Global Carbon Budget (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data. Retrieved 07 November 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-land-use/barbados/dominica/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-land-use/barbados/dominica/">Barbados vs Dominica: Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change
Unit
tonnes
Source
Global Carbon Budget (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
197 places, 34,475 data points, 1850–2024
Last refreshed

Cumulative emissions of carbon dioxide (CO₂) from land-use change since the first year of available data, measured in tonnes.