Serbia vs Somalia: Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change

Serbia
1.17 billion tonnes
in 2024
Somalia
1.19 billion tonnes
in 2024
Serbia rank
85th
Somalia rank
84th

Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change over time

  • Serbia
  • Somalia
0500.0M1.0B1.5B2.0B185019372024

How they compare

Somalia currently reports 1.19 billion tonnes against 1.17 billion tonnes in Serbia, a difference of 22.83 million tonnes.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 175 shared years of data; in 1850 it was Serbia ahead.

Serbia ranks 85th and Somalia ranks 84th of 197 countries.

Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 18 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Serbia Somalia Difference Ahead
1850s 79.55 million tonnes -504,255 tonnes 80.06 million tonnes Serbia
1860s 234.42 million tonnes -2.87 million tonnes 237.29 million tonnes Serbia
1870s 395.41 million tonnes -5.59 million tonnes 401.00 million tonnes Serbia
1880s 557.82 million tonnes -7.85 million tonnes 565.67 million tonnes Serbia
1890s 718.93 million tonnes -9.10 million tonnes 728.03 million tonnes Serbia
1900s 877.49 million tonnes -8.76 million tonnes 886.25 million tonnes Serbia
1910s 1.03 billion tonnes -8.64 million tonnes 1.04 billion tonnes Serbia
1920s 1.18 billion tonnes -1.77 million tonnes 1.18 billion tonnes Serbia
1930s 1.33 billion tonnes 26.29 million tonnes 1.30 billion tonnes Serbia
1940s 1.46 billion tonnes 74.76 million tonnes 1.38 billion tonnes Serbia
1950s 1.63 billion tonnes 152.15 million tonnes 1.48 billion tonnes Serbia
1960s 1.77 billion tonnes 245.53 million tonnes 1.52 billion tonnes Serbia
1970s 1.80 billion tonnes 333.86 million tonnes 1.46 billion tonnes Serbia
1980s 1.79 billion tonnes 438.61 million tonnes 1.35 billion tonnes Serbia
1990s 1.74 billion tonnes 560.69 million tonnes 1.18 billion tonnes Serbia
2000s 1.61 billion tonnes 737.53 million tonnes 870.77 million tonnes Serbia
2010s 1.36 billion tonnes 960.49 million tonnes 396.18 million tonnes Serbia
2020s 1.20 billion tonnes 1.13 billion tonnes 66.72 million tonnes Serbia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cumulative co₂ emissions from land-use change, Serbia or Somalia?
Somalia, at 1.19 billion tonnes against 1.17 billion tonnes in Serbia as of 2024.
What is the difference in cumulative co₂ emissions from land-use change between Serbia and Somalia?
22.83 million tonnes, with Somalia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Somalia?
175 years are reported by both, from 1850 to 2024.
How do Serbia and Somalia rank globally for cumulative co₂ emissions from land-use change?
Serbia ranks 85th and Somalia ranks 84th of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Global Carbon Budget (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Serbia vs Somalia: Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change. Statizoid, drawing on Global Carbon Budget (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data. Retrieved 07 November 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-land-use/serbia/somalia-fed-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/cumulative-co2-land-use/serbia/somalia-fed-rep/">Serbia vs Somalia: Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cumulative CO₂ emissions from land-use change
Unit
tonnes
Source
Global Carbon Budget (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
197 places, 34,475 data points, 1850–2024
Last refreshed

Cumulative emissions of carbon dioxide (CO₂) from land-use change since the first year of available data, measured in tonnes.