South Sudan vs Zimbabwe: Cumulative co2 land use
South Sudan
2.14 billion
in 2024
Zimbabwe
2.18 billion
in 2024
South Sudan rank
67th
Zimbabwe rank
66th
Cumulative co2 land use over time
- South Sudan
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 2.18 billion against 2.14 billion in South Sudan, a difference of 35.81 million.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 175 shared years of data; in 1850 it was South Sudan ahead.
South Sudan ranks 67th and Zimbabwe ranks 66th of 197 countries.
Across the 18 decades both report, South Sudan averaged higher in 12 and Zimbabwe in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Sudan | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1850s | 25.95 million | 6.21 million | 19.74 million | South Sudan |
| 1860s | 72.50 million | 19.07 million | 53.43 million | South Sudan |
| 1870s | 118.58 million | 32.02 million | 86.56 million | South Sudan |
| 1880s | 164.88 million | 44.94 million | 119.93 million | South Sudan |
| 1890s | 211.98 million | 59.82 million | 152.16 million | South Sudan |
| 1900s | 260.01 million | 82.10 million | 177.91 million | South Sudan |
| 1910s | 309.28 million | 117.65 million | 191.62 million | South Sudan |
| 1920s | 361.17 million | 171.39 million | 189.77 million | South Sudan |
| 1930s | 418.73 million | 250.87 million | 167.87 million | South Sudan |
| 1940s | 489.71 million | 367.32 million | 122.39 million | South Sudan |
| 1950s | 596.04 million | 528.81 million | 67.23 million | South Sudan |
| 1960s | 744.10 million | 705.94 million | 38.16 million | South Sudan |
| 1970s | 869.02 million | 897.93 million | 28.90 million | Zimbabwe |
| 1980s | 1.03 billion | 1.13 billion | 104.16 million | Zimbabwe |
| 1990s | 1.33 billion | 1.49 billion | 157.44 million | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 1.58 billion | 1.93 billion | 348.24 million | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 1.94 billion | 2.16 billion | 224.72 million | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 2.11 billion | 2.18 billion | 70.57 million | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cumulative co2 land use, South Sudan or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 2.18 billion against 2.14 billion in South Sudan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in cumulative co2 land use between South Sudan and Zimbabwe?
- 35.81 million, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Sudan and Zimbabwe?
- 175 years are reported by both, from 1850 to 2024.
- How do South Sudan and Zimbabwe rank globally for cumulative co2 land use?
- South Sudan ranks 67th and Zimbabwe ranks 66th of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Cumulative co2 land use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.