Armenia vs Qatar: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre

Armenia
0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Qatar
0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Armenia rank
50th
Qatar rank
49th

Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre over time

  • Armenia
  • Qatar
00000197119972023

How they compare

Qatar currently reports 0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Armenia, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Armenia ahead.

Armenia ranks 50th and Qatar ranks 49th of 202 countries.

Armenia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Armenia Qatar Difference Ahead
2000s 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Armenia
2010s 0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Armenia
2020s 0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Armenia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre, Armenia or Qatar?
Qatar, at 0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Armenia as of 2023.
What is the difference in electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre between Armenia and Qatar?
0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre, with Qatar ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Qatar?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Armenia and Qatar rank globally for electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre?
Armenia ranks 50th and Qatar ranks 49th of 202 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Armenia vs Qatar: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/electricity-generation-from-low-carbon-sources-per-square-kilometre/armenia/qatar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/electricity-generation-from-low-carbon-sources-per-square-kilometre/armenia/qatar/">Armenia vs Qatar: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre
Unit
terawatt-hours per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
202 places, 6,253 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Electricity generation from low-carbon sources divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.