Aruba vs Malta: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre

Aruba
0.0009 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Malta
0.001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Aruba rank
8th
Malta rank
7th

Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre over time

  • Aruba
  • Malta
0000.0010.0010.001199020062023

How they compare

Malta currently reports 0.001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0009 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Aruba, a difference of 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre.

That makes Malta's figure about 1.1 times Aruba's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Malta ahead.

Aruba ranks 8th and Malta ranks 7th of 202 countries.

Aruba has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Aruba Malta Difference Ahead
2000s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Aruba
2010s 0.0008 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0003 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0005 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Aruba
2020s 0.0009 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0009 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Aruba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre, Aruba or Malta?
Malta, at 0.001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0009 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Aruba as of 2023.
What is the difference in electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre between Aruba and Malta?
0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Malta?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Aruba and Malta rank globally for electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre?
Aruba ranks 8th and Malta ranks 7th of 202 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Aruba vs Malta: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/electricity-generation-from-low-carbon-sources-per-square-kilometre/aruba/malta/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/electricity-generation-from-low-carbon-sources-per-square-kilometre/aruba/malta/">Aruba vs Malta: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre
Unit
terawatt-hours per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
202 places, 6,253 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Electricity generation from low-carbon sources divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.