Bangladesh vs Equatorial Guinea: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre

Bangladesh
0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea
0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Bangladesh rank
135th
Equatorial Guinea rank
136th

Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre over time

  • Bangladesh
  • Equatorial Guinea
0000197219972023

How they compare

Bangladesh currently reports 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre.

That makes Bangladesh's figure about 1.1 times Equatorial Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Bangladesh ahead.

Bangladesh ranks 135th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 136th of 202 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Bangladesh averaged higher in 1 and Equatorial Guinea in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bangladesh Equatorial Guinea Difference Ahead
2000s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Bangladesh
2010s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2020s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre, Bangladesh or Equatorial Guinea?
Bangladesh, at 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Equatorial Guinea as of 2023.
What is the difference in electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre between Bangladesh and Equatorial Guinea?
0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre, with Bangladesh ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Equatorial Guinea?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Bangladesh and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre?
Bangladesh ranks 135th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 136th of 202 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bangladesh vs Equatorial Guinea: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/electricity-generation-from-low-carbon-sources-per-square-kilometre/bangladesh/equatorial-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/electricity-generation-from-low-carbon-sources-per-square-kilometre/bangladesh/equatorial-guinea/">Bangladesh vs Equatorial Guinea: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre
Unit
terawatt-hours per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
202 places, 6,253 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Electricity generation from low-carbon sources divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.