Belarus vs Estonia: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre

Belarus
0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Estonia
0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Belarus rank
88th
Estonia rank
87th

Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre over time

  • Belarus
  • Estonia
0000199220072023

How they compare

Estonia currently reports 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Belarus, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Belarus ahead.

Belarus ranks 88th and Estonia ranks 87th of 202 countries.

Estonia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Estonia Difference Ahead
1990s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Estonia
2000s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Estonia
2010s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Estonia
2020s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Estonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre, Belarus or Estonia?
Estonia, at 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Belarus as of 2023.
What is the difference in electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre between Belarus and Estonia?
0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre, with Estonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Estonia?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Belarus and Estonia rank globally for electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre?
Belarus ranks 88th and Estonia ranks 87th of 202 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Estonia: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/electricity-generation-from-low-carbon-sources-per-square-kilometre/belarus/estonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/electricity-generation-from-low-carbon-sources-per-square-kilometre/belarus/estonia/">Belarus vs Estonia: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre
Unit
terawatt-hours per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
202 places, 6,253 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Electricity generation from low-carbon sources divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.