Belarus vs Jordan: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre

Belarus
0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Jordan
0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Belarus rank
88th
Jordan rank
91st

Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre over time

  • Belarus
  • Jordan
0000199220072023

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Jordan, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre.

That makes Belarus's figure about 1.1 times Jordan's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Jordan ahead.

Belarus ranks 88th and Jordan ranks 91st of 202 countries.

Jordan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Jordan Difference Ahead
2000s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Jordan
2010s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Jordan
2020s 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Jordan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre, Belarus or Jordan?
Belarus, at 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.0001 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Jordan as of 2023.
What is the difference in electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre between Belarus and Jordan?
0 terawatt-hours per square kilometre, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Jordan?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Belarus and Jordan rank globally for electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre?
Belarus ranks 88th and Jordan ranks 91st of 202 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Jordan: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/electricity-generation-from-low-carbon-sources-per-square-kilometre/belarus/jordan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/electricity-generation-from-low-carbon-sources-per-square-kilometre/belarus/jordan/">Belarus vs Jordan: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre
Unit
terawatt-hours per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
202 places, 6,253 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Electricity generation from low-carbon sources divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.