Belgium vs Singapore: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre

Belgium
0.002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Singapore
0.0036 terawatt-hours per square kilometre
in 2023
Belgium rank
4th
Singapore rank
2nd

Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre over time

  • Belgium
  • Singapore
00.0010.0020.0030.004197119972023

How they compare

Singapore currently reports 0.0036 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Belgium, a difference of 0.0016 terawatt-hours per square kilometre.

That makes Singapore's figure about 1.8 times Belgium's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Belgium ahead.

Belgium ranks 4th and Singapore ranks 2nd of 202 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 1 and Singapore in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belgium Singapore Difference Ahead
2000s 0.0016 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0013 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0003 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Belgium
2010s 0.0017 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0003 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Singapore
2020s 0.0021 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0028 terawatt-hours per square kilometre 0.0007 terawatt-hours per square kilometre Singapore

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre, Belgium or Singapore?
Singapore, at 0.0036 terawatt-hours per square kilometre against 0.002 terawatt-hours per square kilometre in Belgium as of 2023.
What is the difference in electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre between Belgium and Singapore?
0.0016 terawatt-hours per square kilometre, with Singapore ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Singapore?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Belgium and Singapore rank globally for electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre?
Belgium ranks 4th and Singapore ranks 2nd of 202 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belgium vs Singapore: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/electricity-generation-from-low-carbon-sources-per-square-kilometre/belgium/singapore/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/electricity-generation-from-low-carbon-sources-per-square-kilometre/belgium/singapore/">Belgium vs Singapore: Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Electricity generation from low-carbon sources, per square kilometre
Unit
terawatt-hours per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
202 places, 6,253 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Electricity generation from low-carbon sources divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.